Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 4 Question 125 Discussion

A company has many spoke sites with two data centers. The company wants to exchange the routing information between the data centers and the spoke sites using EIGRP. All locations belong to a single AS. and auto-summarization Is disabled. Which two actions must the company choose? (Choose two.)
A) Exchange all routes between locations and C) Make each spoke site router a stub router
B) Summarize the routes between the hubs.
D) Summarize the routes from spokes to the hubs.
E) Split the network into two separate ASs

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 4 Question 125 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 125
Topic #: 4
[All 300-420 Questions]

A company has many spoke sites with two data centers. The company wants to exchange the routing information between the data centers and the spoke sites using EIGRP. All locations belong to a single AS. and auto-summarization Is disabled. Which two actions must the company choose? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Isadora at May 01, 2026, 11:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alishia
3 days ago
I agree, A is essential for full routing info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
8 days ago
I think A and C are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
13 days ago
E is definitely not an option, we need one AS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
19 days ago
I feel like B is unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
24 days ago
D could work too, but not as effective as A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
29 days ago
C makes sense, keeps spoke sites simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
1 month ago
I agree, A is essential for full routing info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 month ago
I think A and C are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 month ago
Totally agree with A, but I’m not sold on C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
2 months ago
A is definitely right, but B seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
Wait, why would you split into two ASs? That sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
2 months ago
I think D makes more sense than C.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 months ago
Gotta go with A and C for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
2 months ago
I don't think we should split the network into two separate ASs; that seems unnecessary for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
4 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I feel like summarizing routes from spokes to the hubs could help reduce routing table size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about stub routers. Maybe making each spoke site a stub router is a good option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
4 months ago
I think we need to exchange all routes between locations, right? That seems like a fundamental requirement for EIGRP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel