Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 4 Question 125 Discussion

Posted by Isadora on May 01, 2026 at 11:00 PM

A company has many spoke sites with two data centers. The company wants to exchange the routing information between the data centers and the spoke sites using EIGRP. All locations belong to a single AS. and auto-summarization Is disabled. Which two actions must the company choose? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: A, C

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
LU
Luz 17 days ago
Exactly, and C helps manage the spoke sites effectively.
ME
Melinda 22 days ago
A ensures all routes are shared, crucial for connectivity.
HE
Hester 27 days ago
E is definitely not an option, we need one AS.
LO
Lourdes 1 month ago
D might complicate things, stick with A and C.
LU
Luz 1 month ago
B could be useful, but not necessary here.
RO
Rosina 1 month ago
C makes sense, stub routers simplify routing.
AL
Alishia 2 months ago
I agree, A is essential for full routing info.
HA
Hassie 2 months ago
I think A and C are the best choices.
LE
Leonora 2 months ago
E is definitely not an option, we need one AS.
OS
Osvaldo 2 months ago
I feel like B is unnecessary.
BE
Bethanie 2 months ago
D could work too, but not as effective as A.
MI
Ming 2 months ago
C makes sense, keeps spoke sites simple.
TH
Thad 3 months ago
I agree, A is essential for full routing info.
MA
Mariann 3 months ago
I think A and C are the best choices.
HO
Hoa 3 months ago
Totally agree with A, but I’m not sold on C.
JE
Jeniffer 3 months ago
A is definitely right, but B seems unnecessary.
JA
Janine 3 months ago
Wait, why would you split into two ASs? That sounds complicated!
CE
Celestine 3 months ago
I think D makes more sense than C.
KI
King 4 months ago
Gotta go with A and C for sure.
EL
Eleonore 4 months ago
I don't think we should split the network into two separate ASs; that seems unnecessary for this scenario.
TR
Troy 5 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I feel like summarizing routes from spokes to the hubs could help reduce routing table size.
DU
Dusti 6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about stub routers. Maybe making each spoke site a stub router is a good option?
SH
Shad 6 months ago
I think we need to exchange all routes between locations, right? That seems like a fundamental requirement for EIGRP.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel