Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit An engineer is designing a hierarchical ISIS solution for an enterprise customer with these requirements
Users in areas 25 and 55 send and receive traffic from both backbone areas
Link flaps in areas 35 and 45 must not impact other areas
Routers will double within the next 12 months in areas 35 and 45
Which design must the engineer select?
The IS-IS hierarchy should place access or internal area routers at Level 1, boundary routers at Level 1/2, and backbone routers at Level 2. In this exhibit, users in areas 25 and 55 must send and receive traffic through both backbone areas, while link flaps in areas 35 and 45 must not affect other areas. Cisco IS-IS design uses Level 1 areas to contain local topology changes and Level 2 routing to interconnect areas through the backbone. Level 1/2 routers sit at the area boundary and leak or advertise reachability between the local Level 1 area and the Level 2 backbone. Option C matches that hierarchy by placing A-series routers as Level 1, B-series routers as Level 1/2, and C-series routers as Level 2. Making too many routers Level 1/2 would expand the impact of topology changes and reduce scaling benefits. Making backbone routers Level 1 would break interarea design. Reference topics: IS-IS hierarchy, Level 1, Level 2, Level 1/2 routers, failure-domain containment, enterprise scaling.
Ardella
3 days agoTamala
8 days agoBrynn
13 days agoJani
19 days agoArdella
24 days agoNiesha
29 days agoPaul
1 month agoStephen
1 month agoNgoc
1 month agoVelda
2 months agoDemetra
2 months agoRashad
2 months agoWilliam
2 months agoJoaquin
2 months ago