Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 122 Discussion

How is redundancy achieved among Cisco vBond Orchestrators in a Cisco SD-WAN deployment?
A) The IP addresses of all Orchestrators are mapped to a single DNS name.
B) The closest Orchestrator to each Cisco WAN Edge router is selected.
C) Cisco WAN Edge routers are configured with all Orchestrators using their IP addresses and priority.
D) A single Cisco Orchestrator is deployed in each network.

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 122 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 122
Topic #: 15
[All 300-420 Questions]

How is redundancy achieved among Cisco vBond Orchestrators in a Cisco SD-WAN deployment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Luis at Mar 07, 2026, 04:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hermila
3 days ago
I feel like B is a good choice too. It optimizes the connection based on proximity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
8 days ago
Option A seems too simple. DNS can be a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
13 days ago
I agree, C makes sense. Prioritizing Orchestrators helps with redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
19 days ago
I think option C is the best. It ensures all Orchestrators are reachable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
24 days ago
Definitely not D. One Orchestrator isn't redundant at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
29 days ago
Option B sounds good too. Closest Orchestrator can reduce latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
1 month ago
I prefer option C. Configuring all Orchestrators ensures reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 month ago
I think option A is the best choice. DNS mapping simplifies redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
1 month ago
D is not a good option. One Orchestrator is a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
2 months ago
C is the way to go. Configuring all Orchestrators ensures reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
2 months ago
I disagree, B makes more sense. Closest Orchestrator reduces latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. DNS mapping helps with redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 months ago
I’m not sure about that, redundancy needs more than just proximity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
2 months ago
Definitely B, closest Orchestrator makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
4 months ago
Wait, are we really saying one Orchestrator per network is enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
4 months ago
I think option C is the best way to ensure redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
4 months ago
A single DNS name for all Orchestrators is a smart move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
4 months ago
I thought redundancy was only about load balancing, this is interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
5 months ago
Wait, D) doesn't provide redundancy at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
5 months ago
C) is the way to go, all routers need to know all Orchestrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
5 months ago
I disagree, B) is more accurate for selecting the closest Orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
5 months ago
A) is correct, all Orchestrators use a single DNS name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
5 months ago
I definitely recall that having a single Orchestrator, like in option D, wouldn’t provide redundancy, so that one is definitely out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we discussed how the closest Orchestrator is chosen, but I think that was more about performance than redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like the DNS mapping in option A could play a role in redundancy too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
6 months ago
I remember something about how the WAN Edge routers need to know multiple Orchestrators for redundancy, so I think option C might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel