Discuss Cisco 300-420 Exam Topic 15 Question 122

How is redundancy achieved among Cisco vBond Orchestrators in a Cisco SD-WAN deployment?

AThe IP addresses of all Orchestrators are mapped to a single DNS name.

BThe closest Orchestrator to each Cisco WAN Edge router is selected.

CCisco WAN Edge routers are configured with all Orchestrators using their IP addresses and priority.

DA single Cisco Orchestrator is deployed in each network.

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

26 comments · newest first

Hermila 2 months ago

I feel like B is a good choice too. It optimizes the connection based on proximity.

Lizbeth 2 months ago

Option A seems too simple. DNS can be a single point of failure.

Caprice 2 months ago

I agree, C makes sense. Prioritizing Orchestrators helps with redundancy.

Arlean 2 months ago

I think option C is the best. It ensures all Orchestrators are reachable.

Yolande 2 months ago

Definitely not D. One Orchestrator isn't redundant at all!

Delmy 2 months ago

Option B sounds good too. Closest Orchestrator can reduce latency.

Fredric 3 months ago

I prefer option C. Configuring all Orchestrators ensures reliability.

Jacquelyne 3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. DNS mapping simplifies redundancy.

Stanton 3 months ago

D is not a good option. One Orchestrator is a single point of failure.

Anastacia 3 months ago

C is the way to go. Configuring all Orchestrators ensures reliability.

Dierdre 3 months ago

I disagree, B makes more sense. Closest Orchestrator reduces latency.

Raina 3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. DNS mapping helps with redundancy.

Chanel 4 months ago

I’m not sure about that, redundancy needs more than just proximity!

Marguerita 4 months ago

Definitely B, closest Orchestrator makes the most sense.

Mignon 5 months ago

Wait, are we really saying one Orchestrator per network is enough?

Krissy 6 months ago

I think option C is the best way to ensure redundancy.

Hector 6 months ago

A single DNS name for all Orchestrators is a smart move!

Shayne 6 months ago

I thought redundancy was only about load balancing, this is interesting!

Shawnna 6 months ago

Wait, D) doesn't provide redundancy at all!

Winfred 6 months ago

C) is the way to go, all routers need to know all Orchestrators.

Joseph 6 months ago

I disagree, B) is more accurate for selecting the closest Orchestrator.

Ceola 7 months ago

A) is correct, all Orchestrators use a single DNS name.

Reuben 7 months ago

I definitely recall that having a single Orchestrator, like in option D, wouldn’t provide redundancy, so that one is definitely out.

Laurena 7 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we discussed how the closest Orchestrator is chosen, but I think that was more about performance than redundancy.

Ashton 7 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like the DNS mapping in option A could play a role in redundancy too.

Rosalind 7 months ago

I remember something about how the WAN Edge routers need to know multiple Orchestrators for redundancy, so I think option C might be correct.

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 122 Discussion