Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 9 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 9
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to lhe exhibit An engineer must filter EIGRP updates that are received to block all 10 10 10.0/24 prefixes The engineer tests the distribute list and finds one associated prefix. Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Wilford at May 02, 2025, 06:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rolland
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the subnet mask in D? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
3 months ago
I think D is the better choice, it’s more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
Option B seems right, definitely need to deny that prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
I agree with B, modifying the ACL is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
C could work too, but I’m leaning towards B for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
I vaguely remember that the wildcard mask is important here. I think option D mentions the correct mask, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the right action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
4 months ago
I keep getting confused between the deny statements and the permit statements. I think we need to deny the prefix, but I can't recall if it should be in the route map or ACL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
5 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to modify an ACL to block certain prefixes. I feel like option B might be the right choice since it talks about modifying the ACL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
5 months ago
I remember something about route maps and how they can permit or deny prefixes, but I'm not sure if it's the route map or the ACL that's causing the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. The question is asking us to identify the action that resolves the issue, and it looks like Option B is the correct answer. I'll mark that one and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
5 months ago
Alright, I think I've got it. The issue is that there's a permit in the route map or ACL that's allowing the 10.10.10.0/24 prefix, so we need to add a deny statement to block it. Option B or D looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It mentions a distribute list, but the options talk about a route map and an ACL. I'll need to make sure I understand the relationship between these different configuration elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
6 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be identifying the issue with the distribute list and then determining the appropriate action to resolve it. I think I've got a strategy in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and the options to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
9 months ago
I agree with Aileen, A seems like the right choice based on the scenario provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
9 months ago
But A makes more sense because it mentions a deny statement in the route map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. Denying the specific prefix with the correct subnet mask seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
9 months ago
User 2: Agreed, denying 10.10.10.0 with the subnet mask 255.255.255.0 in the ACL should filter out those updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
9 months ago
User 1: I think D is the correct option too. Blocking the specific prefix with the correct subnet mask makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aileen
11 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
11 months ago
Haha, I bet the engineer who wrote this question was feeling pretty clever. Gotta love these tricky EIGRP questions!
upvoted 0 times
Helaine
9 months ago
C) There is a permit in the route map that allows this prefix A deny 20 statement is required with no match condition to block the prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
10 months ago
B) There is a permit in the ACL that allows this prefix into EIGRP. The ACL should be modified to deny 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
10 months ago
A) There is a permit in the route map that allows this prefix A deny 20 statement is required with a match condition to match a new ACL that denies all prefixes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elvis
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B is the best option. Modifying the ACL to deny the specific prefix is the most targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
9 months ago
I see your point, but I still think B is the most effective solution. We should modify the ACL to block the specific prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
9 months ago
I disagree, I believe C is the correct answer. We need to add a deny statement with no match condition in the route map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
10 months ago
I think B is the best option too. It's important to be specific when blocking prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamesha
11 months ago
C seems like the most straightforward solution to me. A deny statement with no match condition should block the prefix effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
10 months ago
User3: Yeah, that seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
User2: I agree, a deny statement with no match condition should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
10 months ago
User1: I think C is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merissa
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. The ACL should be modified to deny the specific prefix, not just use a generic deny statement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel