Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 8 Question 128 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit The R2 OSPF route 10 2 2 0/24 shows in the R1 EIGRP routing table without route redistribution performed between OSPF and EIGRP routing protocols Which configuration is required on router R2 to resolve the issue?
C) Replace the network 10.0.0.0 command with FastEthernet0/0 network in EIGRP 100.
A) passive-interface FastEthernet 0/0 command in OSPF1.
B) Add the no auto-summary command in EIGRP 100.
D) Add the passive-interface FastEthernet 1/0 command in EIGRP 100

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 8 Question 128 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 128
Topic #: 8
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit The R2 OSPF route 10 2 2 0/24 shows in the R1 EIGRP routing table without route redistribution performed between OSPF and EIGRP routing protocols Which configuration is required on router R2 to resolve the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alberta
13 days ago
I prefer option C. It directly addresses the network command issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
18 days ago
I feel like option D could work too. It might help with EIGRP updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
24 days ago
I think option A is the best choice. It keeps OSPF from sending updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
29 days ago
Definitely not A, that won't solve the issue!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
1 month ago
Wait, how is the route showing up without redistribution? That's odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
1 month ago
Not sure about that, I feel like D could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 month ago
I think option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
OSPF and EIGRP need route redistribution to share routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
I think the no auto-summary command in EIGRP could be relevant, but I’m not confident if that applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something similar before, but I can't recall if it was about passive interfaces or something else entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
2 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice one where we had to configure passive interfaces. I think option D might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
2 months ago
I remember studying OSPF and EIGRP interactions, but I'm not sure about the exact command needed here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel