Refer to the exhibit.

A network administrator configured mutual redistribution on R1 and R2 routers, which caused instability in the network. Which action resolves the issue?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 300-410 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
When doing mutual redistribution at multiple points (between OSPF and EIGRP on R1 & R2), we may create routing loops so we should use route-map to prevent redistributed routes from redistributing again into the original domain.
In the below example, the route-map ''SET-TAG'' is used to prevent any routes that have been redistributed into EIGRP from redistributed again into OSPF domain by tagging these routes with tag 1:
8 comments · newest first
LI
Lindsay
12 months ago
Wait, are we really tagging routes? That’s surprising!
WE
Wenona
12 months ago
D seems a bit risky, not sure if it’ll stabilize things.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
C sounds right, denying OSPF into EIGRP makes sense.
DI
Dierdre
1 year ago
I think B could work too, but not sure.
BR
Brett
1 year ago
A is the way to go for tagging!
GE
Gearldine
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to review the information about "NotNow" and consider which scenario best fits that description.
DA
Daryl
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different settings mentioned in the question. I'll need to carefully review the details to make sure I understand the implications of each option before deciding.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
Yeah, I practiced a question like this before. If performance consistency is key, then A seems right.