Discuss Cisco 300-410 Exam Topic 4 Question 127

Refer to the exhibit.

An administrator must configure the router with OSPF for IPv4 and IPv6 networks under a single process. The OSPF adjacencies are not established and did not meet the requirement. Which action resolves the issue?

AReplace OSPF process 10 on the interface with OSPF process 1, and configure an additional router ID with IPv6 address.

BReplace OSPF process 10 on the interface with OSPF process 1, for the VPv6 addressma nd remove process route ID with IPv6 address.

CReplace OSPF process 10 on the interface with OSPF process 1, and remove process 10 from the global configuration.

DReplace OSPF process 10 on the interface with OSPF process 1 for the IPv4 address, and remove process 10 from the global configuration.

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

15 comments · newest first

Denna 1 month ago

Option D is straightforward. Less complexity might resolve the adjacency issue.

Jessenia 2 months ago

I agree with Glory. We need to ensure both protocols are configured properly.

Doyle 2 months ago

Option B confuses me. Why remove the router ID? That doesn’t seem right.

Dominga 2 months ago

I’m leaning towards option C. Removing the conflicting process seems logical.

Brett 2 months ago

I feel like option D could work too. Simplifying the process might help.

Glory 2 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. It addresses both IPv4 and IPv6.

Derick 2 months ago

Removing process 10 is key, so D is the way to go!

Bulah 3 months ago

I think option A could work too, but not sure.

Christene 3 months ago

Wait, can you really mix IPv4 and IPv6 like that?

Rickie 3 months ago

Definitely option D, that makes the most sense!

Janey 3 months ago

OSPF process IDs need to match for adjacencies.

Emile 3 months ago

I vaguely remember that you can't have two OSPF processes running on the same interface, so I think we need to replace process 10, but I’m not sure about the specifics of the IPv6 address.

Luisa 3 months ago

I feel like option D makes sense because it mentions removing process 10, but I'm not completely confident about the details of the global configuration.

Krystal 4 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to change the OSPF process ID, but I can't recall if we needed to remove the old process or just replace it.

Emerson 4 months ago

I remember something about OSPF process IDs needing to match on both ends for adjacencies to form, but I'm not sure which option actually resolves that.

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 4 Question 127 Discussion