MENU
What are two characteristics of a VRF instance? (Choose two)
Suggested Answer: B, D
Get Premium 300-410 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
22 comments · newest first
RA
Ranee
10 months ago
A customer site can be in multiple VRFs? That's interesting!
CA
Cassandra
10 months ago
Wait, are all VRFs really sharing routing tables? That seems off.
SH
Sharen
10 months ago
Totally agree, that's a key feature!
TR
Tresa
10 months ago
Each VRF has its own routing and CEF tables.
CE
Celestina
11 months ago
An interface must be linked to one VRF, right?
GL
Gladys
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like the VPN membership defining a VRF instance was mentioned.
AN
Angella
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought all VRFs shared the same routing tables, but that doesn’t seem right now.
VI
Virgie
11 months ago
I remember something about interfaces needing to be associated with a VRF, so that might be one of the answers.
VA
Valentin
12 months ago
I think one characteristic is that each VRF has its own routing and CEF tables, but I'm not completely sure about the other one.
MI
Mignon
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the VPN membership of a customer site being a VRF characteristic. I'll focus on the routing and CEF table differences and interface association.
LA
Laquita
12 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The correct answers are that each VRF has a different set of routing and CEF tables, and a customer site can be associated with different VRFs.
AR
Arlie
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Is it true that all VRFs share the same customer routing and CEF tables? I'll have to double-check that.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key characteristics are that each VRF has its own routing and CEF tables, and an interface must be associated with one VRF.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between VRF instances.
NA
Nan
1 year ago
I agree with Yen, A and B make sense because each VRF has its own routing and CEF tables.
SU
Sunny
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure C is wrong. VRFs don't share routing and CEF tables, that would defeat the purpose of having separate VRFs.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
I think B and D are the correct answers. Each VRF has its own routing and forwarding tables, and an interface must be associated with a VRF.
EV
Eva
9 months ago
But B is a solid choice for sure!
MA
Matthew
9 months ago
I think A and D could work too.
KA
Kate
10 months ago
I agree with B and D. Makes sense!
AU
Audria
11 months ago
Definitely! Each VRF needs its own tables.
YE
Yen
1 year ago
I think A and B are the correct characteristics.