Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 15 Question 113 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit Which action ensures that 10 10 10 0/24 reaches 10 10 20 0/24 through the direct link between R1 and R2?
B) Configure R1 and R2 links under area 1
A) Configure R1 and R2 LAN links as nonpassive.
C) Configure OSPF link cost to 1 between R1 and R2
D) Configure OSPF path cost to 3 between R1 and R2

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 15 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 15
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit Which action ensures that 10 10 10 0/24 reaches 10 10 20 0/24 through the direct link between R1 and R2?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Melodie at Jul 07, 2025, 06:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lacresha
8 months ago
Surprised that people are overlooking D, it could work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
9 months ago
C makes sense too, but I lean towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
9 months ago
Definitely agree with A, nonpassive links are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
9 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the link costs; I thought lower costs were better, but I'm not sure if setting it to 1 or 3 makes a difference in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like adjusting the OSPF link cost could be the key to making sure the routes are reachable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
10 months ago
I remember something about OSPF areas, but I'm not sure if just putting them under area 1 is enough for the routes to reach each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
10 months ago
I think we might need to configure the links as nonpassive to allow OSPF to send updates between R1 and R2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
10 months ago
Hmm, the OSPF link cost and path cost options are interesting, but I think configuring the links as non-passive is the key to making the route reach the destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
10 months ago
Based on my understanding of OSPF, configuring the links as non-passive seems like the most likely solution to ensure the route is advertised and propagated correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Let me re-read it carefully and think through the OSPF configuration settings that could impact the route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
11 months ago
Okay, the question is asking about how to ensure a specific route reaches the destination through the direct link between R1 and R2. I'll need to consider the OSPF options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like an OSPF configuration question. I'll need to think through the OSPF concepts to determine the right action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
1 year ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! Maybe I should try configuring my router with a unicorn as the next-hop. That would be a real shortcut!
upvoted 0 times
Merri
11 months ago
User3: I'm leaning towards C) Configure OSPF link cost to 1 between R1 and R2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
User2: No, I believe the correct answer is B) Configure R1 and R2 links under area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
User1: I think the answer is A) Configure R1 and R2 LAN links as nonpassive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking D, but now I'm reconsidering. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
12 months ago
User 3: Let's review the exhibit again to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe we should consider all the options before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorethea
1 year ago
I think D) Configure OSPF path cost to 3 between R1 and R2 is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 year ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Setting the OSPF link cost to 1 will make the direct link between R1 and R2 the preferred path.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
1 year ago
That makes sense, it will ensure the direct link between R1 and R2 is the preferred path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
I agree, setting the OSPF link cost to 1 is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlene
1 year ago
But wouldn't configuring the OSPF link cost to 1 between R1 and R2 also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Configure R1 and R2 links under area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Configure R1 and R2 LAN links as nonpassive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring the links under area 1 will ensure that the route is properly propagated through the OSPF domain.
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
1 year ago
C) Configure OSPF link cost to 1 between R1 and R2
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
B) Configure R1 and R2 links under area 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
1 year ago
A) Configure R1 and R2 LAN links as nonpassive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, configuring the links under area 1 is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel