Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 13 Question 13 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.An engineer wanted to set a tag of 30 to route 10 1.80.65/32 but it failed How is the issue fixed?
B) Modify route-map ospf-to-eigrp permit 10 and match prefix-list ccnp2.
A) Modify route-map ospf-to-eigrp permit 30 and match prefix-list ccnp2.
C) Modify prefix-list ccnp3 to add 10.1.64.0/20 le 24
D) Modify prefix-list ccnp3 to add 10.1.64.0/20 ge 32

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 13 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 13
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer wanted to set a tag of 30 to route 10 1.80.65/32 but it failed How is the issue fixed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rosalind
10 months ago
I think C is worth considering too, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
10 months ago
Definitely need to check the prefix-lists, A or B could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
11 months ago
Surprised that this is even an issue, thought it was straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
11 months ago
I disagree, B seems more appropriate for the prefix-list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
11 months ago
Looks like option A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
11 months ago
I've seen this type of SSL/TLS problem before. The answer is to ensure the server certificate is properly chained to the intermediate and root certs. That should resolve the trust issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
11 months ago
Reviewing the Call Quality Dashboard seems like a logical approach to me. It's specifically designed to provide call quality metrics, so that should give me the information I need to identify any network packet loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
11 months ago
I think the answer is C. The fact that users were unable to complete a task due to the search not being error-tolerant would definitely impact their satisfaction with the website. The other options don't seem to directly address satisfaction.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel