Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 10 Question 108 Discussion

Posted by Maile on Mar 08, 2025 at 06:50 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit R2 can reach Loopback222, but R1 SW1 and PC1 cannot communicate with 172.16.222 254 R1 and R2 configurations are shown here

Which EIGRP configuration command resolves the issue?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
RU
Rupert 11 months ago
Not so sure about that, option B might work too.
BI
Billye 11 months ago
I think option A is the right command here.
ZA
Zachary 11 months ago
Wait, why can't PC1 communicate? That’s odd.
FR
Freida 11 months ago
Totally agree, it's a routing issue for sure.
EL
Elenore 12 months ago
R2 can reach Loopback222, but R1 can't.
EM
Emerson 12 months ago
I feel like option B could be right too, but I’m not confident about the subnet mask. It’s tricky with EIGRP configurations!
MA
Mattie 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to enable EIGRP on specific networks, but I can't recall if it's the network command or redistribution that fixes this.
TI
Tina 1 year ago
I think the answer might be option A, "redistribute static," since it seems like R2 needs to share its static routes with R1.
LA
Lavonda 1 year ago
I remember something about EIGRP needing to know about all the networks to route properly, but I'm not sure which command actually adds the static routes.
AI
Aileen 1 year ago
Alright, let me take another look. The network command on R1 seems a bit off - maybe we need to tweak that to get the 172.16.222.254 network properly included in the EIGRP process. I'll give that a try.
LI
Lili 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. The question specifically mentions the router configurations, so I think the answer is likely in one of those commands. I'll need to study those closely to see what's missing.
NI
Nina 1 year ago
I've got an idea - maybe we need to use the 'redistribute static' command on one of the routers to get that 172.16.222.254 network into the EIGRP routing table. That could be the solution here.
MO
Mollie 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. R2 can reach Loopback222, but R1, SW1, and PC1 can't communicate with 172.16.222.254. I'm a bit confused, but I think the key is to figure out how to get that network advertised properly.
AD
Adria 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky EIGRP configuration question. I'll need to carefully review the network diagram and the current router configurations to determine the best approach.
HE
Hector 2 years ago
I think C) R1 (config-router)# network 172.16.222.264 255.255.255.255 is the right command to use
NA
Nathan 2 years ago
But redistributing static routes may not be the best solution in this case
BR
Breana 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) R1(config-router)# redistribute static
ME
Melynda 2 years ago
Haha, I bet the answer is hidden in plain sight. Maybe we need to look at the exhibit a bit more closely. Or maybe the answer is just to turn it off and on again?
JE
Jesusita 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. It looks like we need to enable static route redistribution, but which router should we do that on? Tricky question!
MA
Macy 2 years ago
Wait, what? The question mentions R1 and R2 configurations, but the answer options are all about R1 commands. Seems a bit confusing to me.
SH
Shala 2 years ago
↳ replying to Macy
C) R1 (config-router)# network 172.16.222.264 255.255.255.255
LA
Latanya 2 years ago
↳ replying to Macy
B) R1(conftg-router)# network 172.16.222.254 0.0.0.0
NA
Nancey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Macy
A) R2(config-router) # redistribute static
NA
Nathan 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) R1(conftg-router)# network 172.16.222.254 0.0.0.0
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel