Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-215 Exam - Topic 8 Question 83 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Which two actions should be taken based on the intelligence information? (Choose two.)
B) Add a SIEM rule to alert on connections to identified domains. and D) Block network access to identified domains.
A) Block network access to all .shop domains
C) Use the DNS server to block hole all .shop requests.
E) Route traffic from identified domains to block hole.

Cisco 300-215 Exam - Topic 8 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-215 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 8
[All 300-215 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which two actions should be taken based on the intelligence information? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Kaycee at Aug 24, 2024, 01:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-215 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lucy
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure blocking .shop is the right move?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
9 months ago
C sounds like a solid plan too, but is it really necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
10 months ago
Blocking all .shop domains seems extreme, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
10 months ago
Totally agree with B, we need those alerts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
10 months ago
I think B and D are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards blocking network access to the identified domains, but I wonder if routing traffic to a block hole would be more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
11 months ago
I feel like using the DNS server to block requests could be effective, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
11 months ago
I think adding a SIEM rule is definitely a good move. We practiced similar questions where monitoring was key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
11 months ago
I remember we discussed blocking specific domains in class, but I'm not sure if we should block all .shop domains or just the identified ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
11 months ago
Routing traffic to a block hole seems like it could be effective, but I want to make sure that won't cause any unintended consequences for our network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between blocking network access and using the DNS server to block. I'll need to make sure I understand the technical details before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. Blocking all .shop domains seems a bit heavy-handed, but adding a SIEM rule to monitor those connections could be a good first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the potential implications of each action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
11 months ago
I think the key here is to balance security measures with maintaining business operations. A combination of monitoring and targeted blocking might be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. What exactly do they mean by "historic price movements"? I'll have to read it over again carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 years ago
Hold up, did someone say 'block hole'? I thought we were trying to _avoid_ creating black holes in the network. Sounds like a job for the IT Avengers if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
2 years ago
I'm torn between B and E. Blocking the domains is a solid move, but routing the traffic to a block hole could be a more elegant solution. Gotta be careful with that DNS server, though.
upvoted 0 times
Veda
2 years ago
True, routing traffic from identified domains to a block hole could be a more strategic approach to handle the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 years ago
Blocking network access to identified domains could also be effective in preventing any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
2 years ago
I think adding a SIEM rule to alert on connections to identified domains is a good first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryl
2 years ago
You know, I was just thinking the same thing! Block the identified domains and set up an alert rule to keep an eye on things. Can't be too careful with this kind of intelligence.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
2 years ago
Setting up an alert rule is a good idea to monitor any connections to those domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
2 years ago
Definitely, blocking the identified domains is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
2 years ago
I believe using the DNS server to block all .shop requests could also be effective in preventing any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 years ago
I think adding a SIEM rule to alert on connections to identified domains is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
2 years ago
I agree with Margret, blocking network access seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
2 years ago
I think we should block network access to identified domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
2 years ago
Hmm, I think B and D are the way to go. Blocking all .shop domains seems a bit overkill, and using the DNS server could have some unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
2 years ago
Using the DNS server could definitely cause some issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 years ago
Blocking all .shop domains does seem a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
2 years ago
I agree, B and D are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel