Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-215 Exam - Topic 6 Question 86 Discussion

Posted by Sherron on Sep 17, 2024 at 05:27 AM

A threat actor attempts to avoid detection by turning data into a code that shifts numbers to the right four times. Which anti-forensics technique is being used?

Suggested Answer: C

#:~:text=Obfuscation%20of%20character%20strings%20is,data%20when%20the%20code%20executes.

Get Premium 300-215 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
HI
Hildred 11 months ago
Really? I thought poisoning was more common in these cases.
DA
Dahlia 11 months ago
Totally agree with Mammie, encryption all the way!
JI
Jill 11 months ago
Wait, shifting numbers? Isn't that just a simple cipher?
SH
Shay 11 months ago
I think it's obfuscation, not encryption.
MA
Mammie 12 months ago
That's definitely encryption! Shifting numbers is a classic method.
ME
Mel 12 months ago
I'm leaning towards encryption too, but I wonder if obfuscation could fit here since it also involves making data less recognizable.
VO
Von 1 year ago
Could it be tunneling? I feel like that was mentioned in a different context, but I'm not confident.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about obfuscation, and it sounds similar, but I can't recall the exact details.
LU
Lucina 1 year ago
I think this might be encryption since it involves shifting data, but I'm not entirely sure.
MA
Matthew 1 year ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. Obfuscation is the technique where you intentionally make the data more difficult to interpret, which is exactly what the threat actor is doing by shifting the numbers. Good catch.
ER
Ernestine 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. Encryption, obfuscation, and tunneling all seem like they could be related to hiding data. I'll have to think this through carefully.
SA
Sabrina 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. Shifting numbers to the right four times is a type of obfuscation, so I'm going with C.
RI
Rima 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Shifting the numbers to the right is a way to make the data harder to read and understand, which is the definition of obfuscation. C is the answer.
JU
Juan 2 years ago
Encryption? Nah, that's too obvious. Gotta go with obfuscation for the win!
AN
An 2 years ago
But shifting numbers to the right four times sounds more like obfuscation to me.
YU
Yuriko 2 years ago
Shifting numbers to the right four times? That's some serious 'Matrix' level coding right there.
CO
Coral 2 years ago
Obfuscation? Sounds like a fancy way to say 'hiding in plain sight'.
MI
Mireya 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
Obfuscation can make it harder for investigators to understand the data.
MA
Martina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
D: Poisoning doesn't seem right, it's more about corrupting data.
SH
Shelba 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
C: Tunneling could also work, hiding the data in a tunnel.
AN
Annett 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
B: I think it's obfuscation, making it hard to understand the data.
GI
Gilberto 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
I think encryption would be a better choice to avoid detection.
LO
Loreen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
A: Encryption is the answer, it's all about scrambling the data.
AS
Ashton 2 years ago
↳ replying to Coral
Yes, obfuscation is like hiding something in plain sight.
RO
Royce 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's obfuscation.
AN
An 2 years ago
I think the answer is encryption.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel