Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 4 Question 57 Discussion

IP connectivity and OSPF are preconfigured on all devices where necessary. Do not make any changes to the IP addressing or OSPF. The company policy uses connected interfaces and next hops when configuring static routes except for load balancing or redundancy without floating static. Connectivity must be established between subnet 172.20.20.128/25 on the Internet and the LAN at 192.168.0.0/24 connected to SW1:1. Configure reachability to the switch SW1 LAN subnet in router R2.2. Configure default reachability to the Internet subnet in router R1.3. Configure a single static route in router R2 to reach to the Internet subnet considering both redundant links between routers R1 and R2. A default route is NOT allowed in router R2.4. Configure a static route in router R1 toward the switch SW1 LAN subnet where the primary link must be through Ethernet0/1. and the backup link must be through Ethernet0/2 using a floating route. Use the minimal administrative distance value when required.
A) Explanation: Answer as below configuration: On R2: Enable Conf t Ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.31.1 On R1: Enable Conf t Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.13.3 On R2 Ip route 172.20.20.128 255.255.255.128 e0/2 Ip route 172.20.20.128 255.255.255.128 e0/1 On R1 Ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 e0/1 Ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.12.2 3 Save all configurations after every router from anyone of these command Do wr Or Copy run start

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 4 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-301 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 4
[All 200-301 Questions]

IP connectivity and OSPF are preconfigured on all devices where necessary. Do not make any changes to the IP addressing or OSPF. The company policy uses connected interfaces and next hops when configuring static routes except for load balancing or redundancy without floating static. Connectivity must be established between subnet 172.20.20.128/25 on the Internet and the LAN at 192.168.0.0/24 connected to SW1:

1. Configure reachability to the switch SW1 LAN subnet in router R2.

2. Configure default reachability to the Internet subnet in router R1.

3. Configure a single static route in router R2 to reach to the Internet subnet considering both redundant links between routers R1 and R2. A default route is NOT allowed in router R2.

4. Configure a static route in router R1 toward the switch SW1 LAN subnet where the primary link must be through Ethernet0/1. and the backup link must be through Ethernet0/2 using a floating route. Use the minimal administrative distance value when required.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ngoc
10 months ago
I think the floating route part is a bit confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
10 months ago
The primary link should definitely be Ethernet0/1!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
10 months ago
Wait, no default route on R2? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
11 months ago
Totally agree, just follow the static route rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
11 months ago
OSPF is already set up, so no changes needed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
11 months ago
I’m pretty sure we can’t use a default route on R2, so we need to be careful with the static routes there. I hope I remember the syntax right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
11 months ago
For R1, I believe the primary link should be through Ethernet0/1, but I’m a bit confused about how to set the floating static route correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
11 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar question where we had to configure static routes with redundancy. I think we need to use different administrative distances for the backup route on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
11 months ago
I think for R2, we need to set a static route to the SW1 LAN subnet, but I'm not sure about the next hop. Is it the IP of R1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
11 months ago
Okay, I'm feeling more confident about this. I think the best approach is to use a generic type parameter in the addProcess method, as suggested in Option D. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
11 months ago
I'm feeling a little lost on this one. The options seem similar, and I'm not entirely sure what the differences are between them. I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I believe that EXPOSE does allow connections, but only for containers, not external clients directly. So C seems likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
11 months ago
Remember to look for clear separation between author and publish instances. Network team needs to understand the architecture precisely.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel