Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 3 Question 98 Discussion

Posted by Gwenn on Sep 18, 2024 at 10:16 AM

Exhibit.

The switches are connected via a Cat5 Ethernet cable that was successfully tested. The Interfaces are configured as access ports and are both in a 'down" status. What is the cause of this issue?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 200-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
IL
Ilona 11 months ago
Wait, what's this portfast command? Never heard of it!
PO
Portia 11 months ago
Could be speed settings too, but duplex is more likely.
PA
Pamella 11 months ago
I doubt it's the distance; Cat5 can handle quite a bit.
MA
Marci 11 months ago
I agree, definitely check those settings!
CU
Curtis 12 months ago
Sounds like a duplex mismatch issue.
DI
Dick 12 months ago
I doubt it's the distance issue since Cat5 should support typical lengths. I think it has to be something with the configuration settings instead.
FR
Francene 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the portfast command could be important. If it's missing, could it prevent the ports from coming up?
GR
Gregg 1 year ago
I think I saw a similar question about speed mismatches in our practice tests. That might be what's going on with these switches.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
I remember studying duplex settings and how mismatches can cause ports to stay down. Could that be the issue here?
DU
Dudley 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to read through the question and answers carefully before making my choice.
FL
Fletcher 1 year ago
I remember learning about this kind of issue in class. I think I know the right approach, but I'll double-check my notes just to be sure.
LO
Lorrie 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key details seem to be the Ethernet cable, the interface status, and the possible causes. I'll need to carefully consider each option.
DO
Dottie 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward networking question. I think I can handle this one.
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this. The question is a bit vague, and I'm not confident I know the right answer.
CA
Carmen 2 years ago
This is a classic case of someone forgetting to turn the switches on. I bet they're just sitting there cold and dark, waiting to be powered up.
VI
Vince 2 years ago
Wait, wait, wait. What about the Portfast command? That could be the missing piece of the puzzle. Gotta have that for the ports to come up.
NI
Nilsa 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
We should check the configuration for the Portfast command.
FA
Fallon 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
Maybe the missing Portfast command is causing the problem.
LA
Layla 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
Let's add the Portfast command and see if that resolves the issue with the down ports.
AD
Adela 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
I think you're right. Portfast is essential for those access ports.
DE
Denae 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
Good point! Portfast could definitely be the issue here.
EU
Eun 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
Yeah, without Portfast, the ports won't come up immediately. We should check the configuration for that.
DE
Desirae 2 years ago
↳ replying to Vince
I think you're right, the Portfast command is probably missing. That would explain why the ports are down.
CR
Craig 2 years ago
Nah, it's gotta be the speed mismatch. Those switches need to be configured with the same speed, or they're not gonna communicate properly.
SH
Shad 2 years ago
↳ replying to Craig
C) The speed settings on the switches are mismatched.
SO
Sommer 2 years ago
↳ replying to Craig
B) The distance between the two switches is not supported by Cat5.
BE
Benedict 2 years ago
↳ replying to Craig
A) The switches are configured with incompatible duplex settings.
MA
Mayra 2 years ago
I believe it could also be due to incompatible duplex settings.
JO
Johnetta 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. The distance between the switches could be the culprit. Cat5 doesn't have unlimited range, you know.
TA
Tamra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
The speed settings on the switches are mismatched.
QU
Quentin 2 years ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
The distance between the switches is not supported by Cat5.
EL
Elli 2 years ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
The switches are configured with incompatible duplex settings.
GE
Geoffrey 2 years ago
The duplex settings are definitely the issue here. I've seen this problem so many times before.
SU
Suzan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
C) The speed settings on the switches are mismatched.
HY
Hyun 2 years ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
Yes, that's a common issue with connectivity problems.
AL
Alana 2 years ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
A) The switches are configured with incompatible duplex settings.
JO
Johnna 2 years ago
I agree with Lorenza, mismatched speed settings can cause the interfaces to be down.
LO
Lorenza 2 years ago
I think the issue is with the speed settings on the switches.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel