Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-201 exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 4

[All 200-201 Questions]

What is indicated by an increase in IPv4 traffic carrying protocol 41 ?

Aadditional PPTP traffic due to Windows clients

Bunauthorized peer-to-peer traffic

Cdeployment of a GRE network on top of an existing Layer 3 network

Dattempts to tunnel IPv6 traffic through an IPv4 network

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Danica at Dec 22, 2023, 07:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 200-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Viola

9 months ago

I thought we were done with IPv4 issues, this is surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

10 months ago

Seems like a classic case of GRE deployment too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmett

10 months ago

Wait, are we sure it's not just extra PPTP traffic?

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

10 months ago

I agree, option D makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

10 months ago

Definitely indicates attempts to tunnel IPv6 traffic through IPv4.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

10 months ago

I’m leaning towards option D because it sounds familiar, but I might be mixing it up with something else I studied.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

11 months ago

I feel like I read something about unauthorized traffic being a concern, but I can't recall if that was related to protocol 41.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

11 months ago

I remember practicing a question about GRE tunnels, and I think option C might be the right answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

11 months ago

I think protocol 41 is related to tunneling, but I'm not entirely sure if it's specifically about IPv6 traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

11 months ago

Hmm, I remember learning about this in class. I think an increase in protocol 41 traffic would indicate attempts to tunnel IPv6 over an existing IPv4 network. I'm pretty confident that option D is the right answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

11 months ago

Whoa, this is a tough one. I'm not totally sure what the different options mean, but I think option D sounds the most likely. I'll go with that for now and hope for the best!

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

11 months ago

Okay, let's see. Protocol 41 is the IP-in-IP encapsulation protocol, so an increase in that traffic could mean someone is trying to tunnel IPv6 over an IPv4 network. I'm going to go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

11 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the different IPv4 protocols and what protocol 41 could indicate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the networking jargon in the options. ASON, GMPL5, SNCP - these are not terms I'm comfortable with. I'll have to rely more on my general understanding of network topologies to try and figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

11 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is B. Implementing countermeasures is one of the four main objectives, not something that is not an objective. I'll double-check, but I feel good about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiera

11 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to double-check the details of how method parameters and return types are defined in Java.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

11 months ago

I've got this! Grid properties like grid-template-columns, grid-template-rows, and grid-gap can all be modified. I'm pretty confident the answer is a combination of those options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

1 year ago

D is the way to go, folks. Tuns of companies are trying to squeeze IPv6 through their old IPv4 infrastructure. Bet the network admins are pulling their hair out!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsay

1 year ago

C is an interesting choice, but I doubt a GRE network would generate that much extra traffic. Probably just good old IPv6 tunneling.

upvoted 0 times

Aleisha

1 year ago

I'm sticking with D, tunneling IPv6 traffic seems like the most likely reason for the increase in IPv4 traffic carrying protocol 41.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jannette

1 year ago

I see your point, but C could also be a possibility with a GRE network on top of an existing Layer 3 network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

1 year ago

Yeah, I agree. It's probably just attempts to tunnel IPv6 traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

1 year ago

I think D is the correct answer, tunneling IPv6 traffic through an IPv4 network makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tonja

1 year ago

Hah, just imagine all the Windows users trying to set up their PPTP VPNs. Gotta love that legacy tech still hanging around.

upvoted 0 times

Adell

1 year ago

D) attempts to tunnel IPv6 traffic through an IPv4 network

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

1 year ago

C) deployment of a GRE network on top of an existing Layer 3 network

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

1 year ago

A) additional PPTP traffic due to Windows clients

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Gladis

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but it could also be deployment of a GRE network on top of an existing Layer 3 network, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

1 year ago

I agree with Dorsey, it makes sense that the increase in protocol 41 traffic is due to IPv6 tunneling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

1 year ago

I think an increase in IPv4 traffic carrying protocol 41 indicates attempts to tunnel IPv6 traffic through an IPv4 network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

1 year ago

Option D seems the most likely. I've heard about IPv6 tunneling becoming more common as networks transition to the newer protocol.

upvoted 0 times

Chantell

1 year ago

It's interesting to see how networks are adapting to the transition to IPv6. Option D definitely stands out as a potential reason for the increase in traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

1 year ago

I'm not sure about the other options, but option D does seem like a valid reason for the increase in IPv4 traffic carrying protocol 41.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

1 year ago

I think option C could also be a possibility. GRE networks are often used on top of existing Layer 3 networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

1 year ago

I agree, option D does make sense. It's a common way to handle IPv6 traffic over IPv4 networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Frederica

1 year ago

I'm not sure about that. I think it could also be deployment of a GRE network on top of an existing Layer 3 network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

1 year ago

I agree with Rebbecca. It makes sense that the increase in traffic is due to tunneling IPv6 traffic through IPv4.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

1 year ago

I think an increase in IPv4 traffic carrying protocol 41 indicates attempts to tunnel IPv6 traffic through an IPv4 network.

upvoted 0 times

...