Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Dominque on Jul 06, 2025 at 07:04 PM

The SOC team has confirmed a potential indicator of compromise on an endpoint. The team has narrowed the executable file's type to a new trojan family. According to the NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide, what is the next step in handling this event?

Suggested Answer: C

According to the NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide, the next step in handling an event after confirming a potential indicator of compromise on an endpoint is to collect public information on the malware behavior. This step involves searching for information from various sources, such as antivirus vendors, security blogs, threat intelligence feeds, and online forums, to learn more about the characteristics, capabilities, and impact of the malware. This information can help the SOC team to identify the type, severity, and scope of the incident, as well as to determine the appropriate response actions and mitigation strategies. Isolating the infected endpoint, performing forensics analysis, and prioritizing incident handling are subsequent steps that follow after collecting public information on the malware behavior.Reference:

Computer Security Incident Handling Guide

SP 800-61 Rev. 2, Computer Security Incident Handling Guide


Get Premium 200-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
TH
Thurman 10 months ago
Wait, is isolating really the first thing? Seems risky!
MA
Marya 10 months ago
A makes sense, but what if it spreads before isolation?
SI
Silva 10 months ago
Definitely A, isolating is crucial!
WI
William 11 months ago
I think B is more important, gotta analyze first.
SH
Sherron 11 months ago
C is useful too, but not the immediate step.
BR
Broderick 11 months ago
Collecting information on the malware sounds useful, but I wonder if we should act faster. Is option C really the next step?
RE
Reena 11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where isolating the endpoint was emphasized first. A seems like the best answer here.
JA
Jamal 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about forensics being important too. Maybe B is the right choice?
LO
Long 12 months ago
I think isolating the infected endpoint is crucial to prevent further spread, so I might go with option A.
IS
Isaiah 12 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. Should we focus on forensics analysis or just collect public information on the malware first? I'll need to think this through carefully.
BA
Bambi 1 year ago
Isolating the infected endpoint makes sense to me. That way, we can prevent the malware from impacting other systems while we investigate further.
EL
Elinore 1 year ago
Okay, I think the key here is to follow the NIST incident handling process. Isolating the infected system seems like the logical next step to contain the threat.
BR
Brice 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the NIST guide more closely to determine the proper next step.
EL
Elouise 1 year ago
This seems straightforward - the NIST guide would likely recommend isolating the infected endpoint to prevent further spread of the malware.
CH
Chauncey 1 year ago
Prioritizing incident handling? Sounds like a job for the incident response team - the A-Team of cybersecurity!
LU
Lucy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chauncey
A) Isolate the infected endpoint from the network.
GR
Gregoria 1 year ago
I believe prioritizing incident handling based on the impact is important to minimize damage.
MA
Margurite 1 year ago
Collecting public info on the malware behavior? Pfft, who needs that when you've got the SOC team on the case!
BU
Burma 1 year ago
Isolating the infected endpoint? That's like putting a band-aid on a gunshot wound.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
↳ replying to Burma
D) Prioritize incident handling based on the impact.
JU
Judy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Burma
B) Perform forensics analysis on the infected endpoint.
HE
Helga 1 year ago
↳ replying to Burma
A) Isolate the infected endpoint from the network.
RI
Rikki 1 year ago
Performing forensics analysis on the infected endpoint could also provide valuable insights.
KE
Keena 1 year ago
I agree with Farrah, isolating the endpoint is crucial to prevent further spread.
FA
Farrah 1 year ago
I think the next step should be isolating the infected endpoint.
PA
Pamela 1 year ago
Isolate the infected endpoint? That's a no-brainer! Gotta contain the threat before it spreads like wildfire.
AL
Alesia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pamela
D) Prioritize incident handling based on the impact.
GA
Gayla 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pamela
B) Perform forensics analysis on the infected endpoint.
CA
Candra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pamela
A) Isolate the infected endpoint from the network.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel