MENU
Claude is a manager at Sunnyside Ltd and wishes to run a small project in the procurement department. The project will initiate a small incremental change and will have a short timescale. Because of the size of the project Claude doesn't believe he will need to assign an Executive to the project. Is this correct?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium L5M8 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The guide emphasises that an Executive role should still be assigned and engaged even on small/simple projects, maintaining communication with the Project Manager; they are jointly the most important roles.
28 comments · newest first
CL
Clay
8 months ago
But what if it's a small change? Maybe option B is enough.
PA
Patria
8 months ago
I feel like option D is valid too. Claude should lead as Executive.
DE
Delsie
9 months ago
I agree, communication is key. Option C makes sense.
DE
Denae
9 months ago
Executives help with oversight, even for short projects.
MA
Martina
9 months ago
D is definitely the right choice here.
TI
Timmy
9 months ago
Wait, can Claude really manage without an Executive?
EM
Emerson
9 months ago
C) no -- an Executive should still be assigned and communicate regularly. Executives are like the captains of a ship, even for small voyages!
XU
Xuan
9 months ago
This question is a real eye-opener! I'm glad I don't have to manage projects at Sunnyside Ltd.
KA
Kanisha
10 months ago
D) no -- Claude is the Executive of the project
EV
Evette
10 months ago
B) yes -- executives are only required for high-profile or far-reaching projects
TH
Thurman
10 months ago
C) no -- an Executive should still be assigned and communicate regularly
GL
Glenn
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought that even small projects benefit from having an Executive, so I might go with option C, but I’m not completely confident.
TE
Teddy
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it said that executives are mainly for high-profile projects, which makes me think option B could be correct.
LY
Lynelle
10 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like Claude might still need an Executive to ensure everything aligns with company goals. Maybe option C is right?
LI
Lizbeth
11 months ago
I disagree, B makes more sense.
RA
Raul
11 months ago
I think Claude is wrong. An Executive is important for any project.
PE
Pete
11 months ago
A small project can still benefit from an Executive.
AH
Ahmad
11 months ago
I think I remember that executives are important for oversight, even in smaller projects. So, I’m leaning towards option C.
KA
Karina
12 months ago
C is the safest bet here. Even for a small project, having an Executive involved is important for communication and accountability.
JE
Jesus
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Executives are usually only required for high-profile or far-reaching projects, not small incremental changes.
HE
Henriette
1 year ago
D seems like the right answer to me. Since Claude is the manager, he is essentially the Executive of the project.
LI
Lindsay
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question is a bit tricky. I'll have to think it through carefully.
VE
Venita
1 year ago
I think the answer is C. Even though this is a small project, an Executive should still be assigned to communicate regularly and provide oversight.
NO
Noah
7 months ago
Exactly, it helps avoid any miscommunication.
CH
Charlena
7 months ago
Small projects can still benefit from an Executive's guidance.
VI
Viola
7 months ago
Definitely, communication keeps everyone aligned.
MA
Mammie
8 months ago
I agree, oversight is crucial.
SU
Sueann
11 months ago
A little oversight goes a long way, even in small projects.