New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L5M8 Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M8 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All L5M8 Questions]

Claude is a manager at Sunnyside Ltd and wishes to run a small project in the procurement department. The project will initiate a small incremental change and will have a short timescale. Because of the size of the project Claude doesn't believe he will need to assign an Executive to the project. Is this correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The guide emphasises that an Executive role should still be assigned and engaged even on small/simple projects, maintaining communication with the Project Manager; they are jointly the most important roles.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Patria
15 hours ago
I feel like option D is valid too. Claude should lead as Executive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
6 days ago
I agree, communication is key. Option C makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
11 days ago
Executives help with oversight, even for short projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
16 days ago
D is definitely the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
21 days ago
Wait, can Claude really manage without an Executive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
26 days ago
C) no -- an Executive should still be assigned and communicate regularly. Executives are like the captains of a ship, even for small voyages!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 month ago
This question is a real eye-opener! I'm glad I don't have to manage projects at Sunnyside Ltd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 month ago
D) no -- Claude is the Executive of the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 month ago
B) yes -- executives are only required for high-profile or far-reaching projects
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
2 months ago
C) no -- an Executive should still be assigned and communicate regularly
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought that even small projects benefit from having an Executive, so I might go with option C, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it said that executives are mainly for high-profile projects, which makes me think option B could be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like Claude might still need an Executive to ensure everything aligns with company goals. Maybe option C is right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
2 months ago
I disagree, B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 months ago
I think Claude is wrong. An Executive is important for any project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
3 months ago
A small project can still benefit from an Executive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
3 months ago
I think I remember that executives are important for oversight, even in smaller projects. So, I’m leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
3 months ago
C is the safest bet here. Even for a small project, having an Executive involved is important for communication and accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Executives are usually only required for high-profile or far-reaching projects, not small incremental changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
4 months ago
D seems like the right answer to me. Since Claude is the manager, he is essentially the Executive of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question is a bit tricky. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
4 months ago
I think the answer is C. Even though this is a small project, an Executive should still be assigned to communicate regularly and provide oversight.
upvoted 0 times
Sueann
3 months ago
A little oversight goes a long way, even in small projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel