New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
[All L5M3 Questions]

Buyer A and Supplier B have had a disagreement regarding a breach in the contract. They are looking to resolve the issue via arbitration. Which of the following is true about arbitration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The outcome is binding and enforceable is the correct answer. However the ruling can be appealed. Arbitration is a flexible approach, and the outcome doesn't set legal precedent. The role of the arbitrator is to reach a decision, only in mediation is the role of the third party to facilitate dialogue rather than reach a decision. See p.80 for more information on arbitration.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Amos
3 months ago
The arbitrator's role is mainly to facilitate dialogue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
Wait, does arbitration really set legal precedents?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
3 months ago
I thought there were strict rules, but not as strict as court.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's a key point!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
4 months ago
The outcome is binding and enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
4 months ago
I definitely remember that arbitration doesn't set legal precedents, so D seems wrong to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I feel like I saw a practice question where the arbitrator's role was more about making decisions than just facilitating dialogue, so I'm leaning away from C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about arbitration being less formal than court, so maybe B isn't true?
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
I think option A is correct because arbitration outcomes are usually binding, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. The arbitrator's role is to facilitate dialogue, but the outcome is also binding? That seems a bit contradictory to me. I'll have to re-read the question and options more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution process, so it has to have some structure and rules. And the whole point is to resolve the disagreement, so the outcome must be binding, not just a recommendation. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know arbitration has a formal process, but I can't remember if the outcome is binding or not. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident I know the answer is A - the outcome of arbitration is binding and enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 year ago
C) just sounds like conflict resolution 101 - the arbitrator is there to help, not make the decisions for us.
upvoted 0 times
Galen
1 year ago
D) the outcome will set a legal precedent
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 year ago
C) the arbitrator's role is to facilitate dialogue
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 year ago
B) there are strict rules and processes to follow
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
1 year ago
A) the outcome is binding and enforceable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latonia
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward legal question, unlike that last one about configuring a network router. I'm sticking with A).
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
1 year ago
I'll go with A) - can't argue with a legally binding outcome, even if the process is a bit stuffy.
upvoted 0 times
Emelda
1 year ago
C) the arbitrator's role is to facilitate dialogue
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
1 year ago
B) there are strict rules and processes to follow
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 year ago
A) the outcome is binding and enforceable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
1 year ago
B) sounds about right - there are formal rules and procedures that must be followed in arbitration.
upvoted 0 times
Helene
1 year ago
C) the arbitrator's role is to facilitate dialogue
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
B) there are strict rules and processes to follow
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
A) the outcome is binding and enforceable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) the arbitrator's role is to facilitate dialogue because they are supposed to help the parties reach a resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) there are strict rules and processes to follow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) the outcome is binding and enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 year ago
A) is definitely the correct answer here. Arbitration decisions are legally binding and enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
Gretchen
1 year ago
A) Yes, the outcome of arbitration will set a legal precedent for future cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
C) The arbitrator's role is to facilitate dialogue between the parties involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
1 year ago
B) That's right, there are strict rules and processes to follow in arbitration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
1 year ago
A) is definitely the correct answer here. Arbitration decisions are legally binding and enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel