Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

John has signed a document with Larry that says that he will give Larry his car. Both John and Larry are over the age of 18 and are of sound mind. Larry accepts this offer and signs the document. Is this a contract?
D) no- this document is an invitation to treat
A) yes- it has been signed
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
C) no- there is no consideration

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All L5M3 Questions]

John has signed a document with Larry that says that he will give Larry his car. Both John and Larry are over the age of 18 and are of sound mind. Larry accepts this offer and signs the document. Is this a contract?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

'restitution damages cannot be mitigated by the actions of the innocent party' is the untrue state-ment out of these four. The general principle of Restitution Damages is that the innocent party is expected to be proactive in mitigating the consequences of any breach and should not allow costs to spiral out of control. See p. 124


by Candra at Jul 03, 2024, 04:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L5M3 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Robt
9 months ago
Isn't this just a promise? Not sure it's a real contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
9 months ago
Totally agree, they both consented and are of age!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
10 months ago
Wait, is it really a contract without any payment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
10 months ago
I think it needs consideration to be valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
10 months ago
Definitely a contract, both signed it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
10 months ago
I remember that a contract needs to have all elements, including consideration. So, I think option C might be the right choice since it seems like there's no exchange happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
11 months ago
I'm a bit uncertain about whether this counts as a contract. I feel like we discussed something similar in class, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
11 months ago
I think option B makes sense because both parties are of sound mind and consented. That seems like a key point in contract law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
11 months ago
I remember that for a contract to be valid, there needs to be consideration. I'm not sure if giving a car counts as consideration here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
11 months ago
I'm a little confused on the consideration piece. If there's no exchange of value, then it might not be a valid contract. I'll need to review that concept again before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The fact that they're both over 18 and of sound mind suggests capacity, and the signing indicates offer and acceptance. The tricky part is the consideration, but I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions that they both signed the document, but it doesn't explicitly say there was consideration. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward contract question. I'll focus on the key elements - offer, acceptance, and consideration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
11 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The key elements of a contract are all present - offer, acceptance, and capacity. The lack of consideration is the only potential issue, but I think option B is the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
Statement 4 seems completely off because it contradicts the core principles of flexibility and decentralization, but the others feel a bit fuzzy to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about a type of mass model, and the correct answer is that an In-place mass model is not saved externally from the project file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about behavior modification techniques. I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct approach the parents are using.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
1 year ago
This is the kind of contract dispute that would make Judge Judy reach for her gavel and a bottle of Pepto-Bismol!
upvoted 0 times
Lottie
1 year ago
D) no- this document is an invitation to treat
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
1 year ago
C) no- there is no consideration
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
A) yes- it has been signed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
1 year ago
Wait, wait, wait... John's giving Larry his car? I bet Larry's already planning to trade it in for a hot tub and a lifetime supply of avocado toast!
upvoted 0 times
Carolynn
1 year ago
C) no- there is no consideration
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
A) yes- it has been signed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
1 year ago
Whoa, hold on there! If John and Larry are both of sound mind and over 18, it's gotta be a valid contract, right? I'm going with B, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Absolutely, it's a valid contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 year ago
A) yes- it has been signed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
1 year ago
Ha! I bet Larry's trying to pull a fast one on John. This sounds more like an invitation to treat than a contract. I'd go with D.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
1 year ago
D) no- this document is an invitation to treat
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
C) no- there is no consideration
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
1 year ago
A) yes- it has been signed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiera
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Isn't consideration an essential element of a contract? I'm leaning towards C - no consideration, so it's not a valid contract.
upvoted 0 times
Linn
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
1 year ago
A) yes- it has been signed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissa
1 year ago
But what about consideration? Isn't that necessary for a contract to be valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
1 year ago
I agree with France, as long as they are of sound mind and over 18, it should be a valid contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. Both parties have consented and have the capacity to enter into a contract. That's the key requirement for a valid contract.
upvoted 0 times
Latrice
1 year ago
Agreed. Without those elements, the contract would not be enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
That's correct. Consent and capacity are essential for a valid contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
1 year ago
B) yes- both parties consent and have capacity to do so
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
1 year ago
A) yes- it has been signed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
1 year ago
I think it's a contract because both parties consented.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel