MENU
Which of the following would be an impact of low stock in the supply chain?
Warehouse space would all be full with excess stock
There may be delays and higher costs to fulfill supply
Stock may not be available at times of high demand
Lead times would reduce and purchase costs would fall
A. 2 and 3 only B. 1 and 3 only C. 2 and 4 only D. 1 and 4 only
Suggested Answer:
Get Premium L4M7 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Low stock levels can lead to:
Delays and higher fulfillment costs: When stock is insufficient, emergency orders and expedited shipping may be necessary, increasing costs.
Stockouts during high demand: Insufficient inventory can lead to missed sales opportunities, negatively impacting customer satisfaction.
Whole-life asset management seeks to balance inventory levels to avoid stockouts while minimizing holding costs.
33 comments · newest first
GR
Graciela
11 months ago
I disagree with option D, it doesn't add up.
AD
Adrianna
11 months ago
Higher costs are a given when stock is low.
FL
Flo
12 months ago
Surprised that people think lead times would reduce with low stock!
BE
Beckie
12 months ago
I think 1 and 3 make more sense.
PR
Providencia
1 year ago
Definitely 2 and 3, delays are a big issue!
EM
Emilio
1 year ago
I feel like option 1 about excess stock doesn't fit with low stock, so I think it might be between A and C.
KE
Kenda
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where low stock affected lead times, but I can't recall if it always reduces costs.
ON
Oneida
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think stock shortages can cause issues during peak demand, which makes option 3 likely too.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
I remember studying that low stock can definitely lead to delays and higher costs, so option 2 seems right.
DE
Delbert
1 year ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of supply chain impacts. I'll methodically go through each option and evaluate whether it's a likely outcome of low stock. Careful analysis is important here.
RO
Rodrigo
1 year ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I think I need to re-read the question and options a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking. Identifying the impacts of low stock is the key, but I don't want to rush into an answer.
EL
Elenor
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The correct answer is B. 1 and 3 only. Low stock would mean the warehouse isn't full, and there would be delays and higher costs to fulfill supply, as well as stock not being available during high demand.
RE
Rebecka
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm a bit confused about the different options and how they relate to low stock. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
HU
Hui
1 year ago
I think the key here is to identify the impacts of low stock in the supply chain. The options seem to cover different potential impacts, so I'll need to carefully consider each one.
DY
Dyan
2 years ago
D, hands down. Reduced lead times and lower costs? Sign me up! It's like a Black Friday sale, but all year round.
OZ
Ozell
2 years ago
Definitely, it's a win-win situation. Plus, having excess stock can be costly and inefficient.
GO
Goldie
2 years ago
I agree, D seems like the best option. Who wouldn't want lower costs and faster lead times?
CH
Chauncey
2 years ago
I believe the answer would be option B, 1 and 3 only. Excess stock would not be a problem with low stock.
NO
Norah
2 years ago
I agree with you, Wilda. Stock may not be available at times of high demand.
WI
Wilda
2 years ago
I think the impact of low stock would be delays and higher costs.
TH
Thurman
2 years ago
C is the answer, people! Higher costs and longer lead times are the name of the game. And who wants to pay more for less? Not this guy!
EL
Elvera
2 years ago
We don't want excess stock taking up warehouse space either. C is the way to go.
TA
Tashia
2 years ago
Definitely. Low stock can lead to delays and increased costs in the supply chain.
JE
Jess
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have the right amount of stock to meet demand.
MA
Matthew
2 years ago
I think C is the answer. Higher costs and longer lead times are not ideal.
DE
Deeanna
2 years ago
I'm going with A. Delays and unavailable stock are the real deal when you're running low. Who needs extra space when you've got nothing to put in it?
KI
Kip
2 years ago
So, the correct answer would be A. 2 and 3 only.
ME
Mee
2 years ago
Definitely, it's important to have the right amount of stock to meet demand without extra costs.
HI
Hildegarde
2 years ago
Yeah, having excess stock just takes up space and doesn't help when demand is high.
GI
Gianna
2 years ago
I agree, delays and higher costs are a big problem when stock is low.
NO
Novella
2 years ago
Option B all the way! Low stock means empty shelves, not full warehouses. Gotta keep those customers happy and stocked up.
LO
Louvenia
2 years ago
I agree, low stock would definitely lead to delays and higher costs. Option B it is!
DE
Delisa
2 years ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Empty shelves would not make customers happy.