Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 4 Question 50 Discussion

Posted by Sharita on Sep 17, 2024 at 02:15 PM

A company is about to invite tenders for a contract to clean external windows at several premises, all at least three storeys high. It is going to do this in two stages. For the first stage, it will issue a pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ) and, from the replies, select at least five potential suppliers to invite to tender. Which of the following is a selection criterion rather than an award criterion?

Suggested Answer: B

The correct answer is 'run a restricted competition -- send out a PQQ'. This Question: tests both

your understanding of when to run open and restricted competitions (which is explained on p.75) and your understanding of tender documents. Mandy should run a restricted competition- there are a lot of options in the marketplace and this will allow her to pre-qualify those who best suit her requirements. Running an open competition when there are lots of suppliers would be too time-consuming- you need a way of making a short-list. When you run a restricted competition, the first stage is sending out a PQQ- pre-qualification questionnaire; this document is sent to suppliers asking for necessary information to support their qualification as an approved supplier.


Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
LY
Lyda 11 months ago
Price should never be a selection criterion, just an award one!
MA
Marta 11 months ago
Environmental impact assessments should be a priority, right?
LA
Lazaro 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems like method statements could fit too.
BU
Buck 12 months ago
Totally agree, risk assessments are key for selection!
DE
Delpha 1 year ago
I think it's definitely about risk assessments.
JI
Jin 1 year ago
Environmental impact assessments seem like they could be part of the selection process, but I’m not completely confident about that.
JU
Juliann 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to differentiate between selection and award criteria, and I think risk assessments might be more about safety than selection.
TH
Thaddeus 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I remember that method statements are usually part of the tender evaluation, not the pre-qualification stage.
IR
Irma 1 year ago
I think the selection criteria are more about the qualifications and capabilities of the suppliers, so maybe it's not about the price.
FR
Frank 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The question is asking for a selection criterion, not an award criterion. Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is B, "Method statements for previous contracts." That seems like a logical criterion the company would use to pre-qualify potential suppliers.
MI
Miles 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the difference between selection and award criteria, but I'm not sure which of these options would be considered a selection criterion. I'll need to think it through carefully.
SH
Sherita 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to distinguish between selection criteria and award criteria. The question is asking which of the options is a selection criterion rather than an award criterion.
LA
Laquita 1 year ago
Okay, let me see if I can figure this out. The company is using a two-stage process, with a pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ) to select at least five potential suppliers to invite to tender. So the selection criteria would be used in that first stage, before the actual award of the contract. I think I've got it now.
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
Did you hear about the window cleaner who got stuck on the 3rd floor? He had a hard time getting down, but at least he had a pane-ful experience.
VE
Venita 1 year ago
I'm going with B - method statements for previous contracts. That's a great way to see if the contractors have the experience to handle this kind of work.
CA
Carole 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
D: It makes sense to focus on their past work to ensure they can handle the job.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
C: I think that's a smart way to narrow down the potential suppliers.
CH
Chau 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
B: Yeah, it shows they have the experience needed for the job.
MA
Marta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
A: I agree, method statements for previous contracts is definitely a selection criterion.
TI
Tijuana 2 years ago
You know, if they don't do a proper environmental impact assessment, the company might end up with more dirt on their windows than before! That's not the kind of clean they're looking for.
ER
Erick 2 years ago
A risk assessment is definitely a selection criterion, not an award criterion. It's all about whether the contractor can safely do the job, not about the price.
MA
Marica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Erick
Experience in similar contracts
VI
Virgie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Erick
Health and safety record
DE
Deandrea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Erick
Risk assessment
CA
Carmen 2 years ago
I believe D) Environmental impact assessment is also a selection criterion, as it focuses on the supplier's environmental practices.
BA
Barney 2 years ago
I agree with Michel, method statements for previous contracts seem like a selection criterion.
MI
Michel 2 years ago
I think the selection criterion is B) Method statements for previous contracts.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel