Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 51 Discussion

Which of the following are advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement with the buyer's product development team?
A) 1 and 2 only
B) 1 and 3 only
C) 2 and 3 only
D) 2 and 4 only

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M6 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 10
[All L4M6 Questions]

Which of the following are advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement with the buyer's product development team?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Danny should issue a RFI (Request for Information). His next step would be to find out more about the products available by asking suppliers for information- this will help him put a spec together before he goes out to tender. The other options mean; RFQ - request for quotation- when you ask suppliers to submit a price. ITT- Invitation to tender -- a document you send out to suppliers which details all the information about the tender (this usually involves both price and quality components of assessment). OJEU- Official Journal of the European Union- where tenders for the Public Sector are published. For more info on RFI see p.74


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Annice
9 months ago
Definitely helps with innovation and faster time to market!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure this always works? Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
10 months ago
I think it can also increase costs if not managed well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
10 months ago
Totally agree, it streamlines the development process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
10 months ago
Early supplier involvement can lead to better product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
10 months ago
I think option 3 relates to innovation, but I’m not confident about the others. I should probably review the advantages again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
11 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, but I can’t recall the exact benefits listed. I hope I can eliminate some options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
11 months ago
I think option 1 was about cost savings, which seems like a clear advantage. I might lean towards B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
11 months ago
I remember discussing how early supplier involvement can lead to better product quality, but I'm not sure which options specifically highlight that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
11 months ago
This seems like an important concept to understand for the exam. I'll review my notes on supplier involvement and try to reason through the best answer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
Early supplier involvement could provide valuable insights and help optimize the product design. I'm leaning towards one of the options that includes that advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the key differences between them before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the potential advantages carefully to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement. I think I have a good handle on this, so I'll give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
Wait, is 'reduced time-to-market' a real phrase or did they just make that up to confuse us? I'll go with C, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
1 year ago
A: So, you're going with C as well? Sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 year ago
C: Yeah, those are definitely advantages for the buyer when the supplier is involved early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
B: I think it's also about improving product quality and reducing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 year ago
A: Reduced time-to-market is a real term, it means getting the product to market faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
Ha! Early supplier involvement? More like early supplier headache. But I guess option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
1 year ago
Definitely, it's all about finding that balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
1 year ago
But it does help with cost and quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
Yeah, having suppliers involved early can be a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paz
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to go with D. Getting access to the supplier's expertise and technology is a huge plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C. Improved quality and reduced time-to-market seem like the biggest perks for the buyer here.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
1 year ago
Yeah, those are definitely important factors to consider when involving suppliers early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
I think C makes sense. Quality and time-to-market are key benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
1 year ago
I believe the correct answer is C) 2 and 3 only, as those are the main benefits for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
1 year ago
Hmm, I think it's B. Early supplier involvement can help with design optimization and cost reduction, which are key advantages for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
I agree, it can lead to better product quality and cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
I think the advantages of early supplier involvement are important for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel