Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M6 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 10
[All L4M6 Questions]

Which of the following are advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement with the buyer's product development team?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Danny should issue a RFI (Request for Information). His next step would be to find out more about the products available by asking suppliers for information- this will help him put a spec together before he goes out to tender. The other options mean; RFQ - request for quotation- when you ask suppliers to submit a price. ITT- Invitation to tender -- a document you send out to suppliers which details all the information about the tender (this usually involves both price and quality components of assessment). OJEU- Official Journal of the European Union- where tenders for the Public Sector are published. For more info on RFI see p.74


by Erasmo at Sep 19, 2024, 08:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annice
6 months ago
Definitely helps with innovation and faster time to market!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure this always works? Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
6 months ago
I think it can also increase costs if not managed well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
7 months ago
Totally agree, it streamlines the development process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
7 months ago
Early supplier involvement can lead to better product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
7 months ago
I think option 3 relates to innovation, but I’m not confident about the others. I should probably review the advantages again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
7 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, but I can’t recall the exact benefits listed. I hope I can eliminate some options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
7 months ago
I think option 1 was about cost savings, which seems like a clear advantage. I might lean towards B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
8 months ago
I remember discussing how early supplier involvement can lead to better product quality, but I'm not sure which options specifically highlight that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
8 months ago
This seems like an important concept to understand for the exam. I'll review my notes on supplier involvement and try to reason through the best answer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
8 months ago
Early supplier involvement could provide valuable insights and help optimize the product design. I'm leaning towards one of the options that includes that advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
8 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the key differences between them before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the potential advantages carefully to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement. I think I have a good handle on this, so I'll give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
Wait, is 'reduced time-to-market' a real phrase or did they just make that up to confuse us? I'll go with C, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
11 months ago
A: So, you're going with C as well? Sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
11 months ago
C: Yeah, those are definitely advantages for the buyer when the supplier is involved early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
11 months ago
B: I think it's also about improving product quality and reducing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
12 months ago
A: Reduced time-to-market is a real term, it means getting the product to market faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
Ha! Early supplier involvement? More like early supplier headache. But I guess option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
12 months ago
Definitely, it's all about finding that balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
1 year ago
But it does help with cost and quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
Yeah, having suppliers involved early can be a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paz
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to go with D. Getting access to the supplier's expertise and technology is a huge plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C. Improved quality and reduced time-to-market seem like the biggest perks for the buyer here.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
1 year ago
Yeah, those are definitely important factors to consider when involving suppliers early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
I think C makes sense. Quality and time-to-market are key benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
1 year ago
I believe the correct answer is C) 2 and 3 only, as those are the main benefits for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
1 year ago
Hmm, I think it's B. Early supplier involvement can help with design optimization and cost reduction, which are key advantages for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
I agree, it can lead to better product quality and cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
I think the advantages of early supplier involvement are important for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel