Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 51 Discussion

Posted by Erasmo on Sep 19, 2024 at 08:15 AM

Which of the following are advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement with the buyer's product development team?

Suggested Answer: A

Danny should issue a RFI (Request for Information). His next step would be to find out more about the products available by asking suppliers for information- this will help him put a spec together before he goes out to tender. The other options mean; RFQ - request for quotation- when you ask suppliers to submit a price. ITT- Invitation to tender -- a document you send out to suppliers which details all the information about the tender (this usually involves both price and quality components of assessment). OJEU- Official Journal of the European Union- where tenders for the Public Sector are published. For more info on RFI see p.74


Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
AN
Annice 11 months ago
Definitely helps with innovation and faster time to market!
CH
Chantell 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure this always works? Seems too good to be true.
CH
Christoper 12 months ago
I think it can also increase costs if not managed well.
CA
Carma 12 months ago
Totally agree, it streamlines the development process!
FA
Fallon 1 year ago
Early supplier involvement can lead to better product quality.
IS
Isaiah 1 year ago
I think option 3 relates to innovation, but I’m not confident about the others. I should probably review the advantages again.
AR
Arthur 1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, but I can’t recall the exact benefits listed. I hope I can eliminate some options.
ED
Edison 1 year ago
I think option 1 was about cost savings, which seems like a clear advantage. I might lean towards B or D.
CR
Craig 1 year ago
I remember discussing how early supplier involvement can lead to better product quality, but I'm not sure which options specifically highlight that.
ED
Edward 1 year ago
This seems like an important concept to understand for the exam. I'll review my notes on supplier involvement and try to reason through the best answer choice.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
Early supplier involvement could provide valuable insights and help optimize the product design. I'm leaning towards one of the options that includes that advantage.
LU
Lucille 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the key differences between them before selecting an answer.
TR
Troy 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the potential advantages carefully to determine the best answer.
AL
Alex 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the advantages for the buyer of early supplier involvement. I think I have a good handle on this, so I'll give it a shot.
SY
Sylvia 1 year ago
Wait, is 'reduced time-to-market' a real phrase or did they just make that up to confuse us? I'll go with C, just to be safe.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sylvia
A: So, you're going with C as well? Sounds good to me.
CO
Corazon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sylvia
C: Yeah, those are definitely advantages for the buyer when the supplier is involved early on.
LO
Lonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sylvia
B: I think it's also about improving product quality and reducing costs.
CE
Cecily 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sylvia
A: Reduced time-to-market is a real term, it means getting the product to market faster.
AH
Ahmed 2 years ago
Ha! Early supplier involvement? More like early supplier headache. But I guess option B makes the most sense.
RE
Rex 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ahmed
Definitely, it's all about finding that balance.
CH
Christene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ahmed
But it does help with cost and quality.
AL
Alaine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ahmed
Yeah, having suppliers involved early can be a headache.
SH
Shawnna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ahmed
I think option B is the best choice.
PA
Paz 2 years ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to go with D. Getting access to the supplier's expertise and technology is a huge plus.
NI
Nickole 2 years ago
I'm leaning towards C. Improved quality and reduced time-to-market seem like the biggest perks for the buyer here.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nickole
Yeah, those are definitely important factors to consider when involving suppliers early on.
TA
Tamesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nickole
I think C makes sense. Quality and time-to-market are key benefits.
MA
Martha 2 years ago
I believe the correct answer is C) 2 and 3 only, as those are the main benefits for the buyer.
IE
Iesha 2 years ago
Hmm, I think it's B. Early supplier involvement can help with design optimization and cost reduction, which are key advantages for the buyer.
YA
Yasuko 2 years ago
I agree, it can lead to better product quality and cost savings.
LE
Leonor 2 years ago
I think the advantages of early supplier involvement are important for the buyer.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel