Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M2 Topic 4 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M2 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 4
[All L4M2 Questions]

One of the disadvantages of using standards in specification is that...

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Cracks on the jet engine is a closed-end problem. A typical problem solving process has 8 steps:

Step 1: Define the Problem

- What is the problem?

- How did you discover the problem?

- When did the problem start and how long has this problem been going on?

- Is there enough data available to contain the problem and prevent it from getting passed to the next process step? If yes, contain the problem.

Step 2: Clarify the Problem

- What data is available or needed to help clarify, or fully understand the problem?

- Is it a top priority to resolve the problem at this point in time?

- Are additional resources required to clarify the problem? If yes, elevate the problem to your leader to help locate the right resources and form a team.

- Consider a Lean Event (Do-it, Burst, RPI, Project).

- Ensure the problem is contained and does not get passed to the next process step.

Step 3: Define the Goals

- What is your end goal or desired future state?

- What will you accomplish if you fix this problem?

- What is the desired timeline for solving this problem?

Step 4: Identify Root Cause of the Problem

- Identify possible causes of the problem.

- Prioritize possible root causes of the problem.

- What information or data is there to validate the root cause?

Step 5: Develop Action Plan

- Generate a list of actions required to address the root cause and prevent problem from getting to others.

- Assign an owner and timeline to each action.

- Status actions to ensure completion.

Step 6: Execute Action Plan

- Implement action plan to address the root cause.

- Verify actions are completed.

Step 7: Evaluate the Results

- Monitor and Collect Data.

- Did you meet your goals defined in step 3? If not, repeate th 8-Step Process.

- Were there any unforeseen consequences?

- If problem is resolved, remove activities that were added previously to contain the problem.

Step 8: Continuously Improve

- Look for additional opportunities to implement solution.

- Ensure problem will not come back and communicate lessons learned.

- If needed, repeat the 8-Step Problem Solving Process to drive further improvements.

ANA has already known what is going on, the next step they should adopt is collecting more infor-mation on the problem. If the airline is hurry to the solution, it may choose 'Generate options ad-dressing the issue'. The crack on turbine blade can be welded, or the airline replaces a new blade. However, jumping to solution without knowing the root cause does not completely solve the prob-lem. The root cause is unaddressed, then it may occur in the future. Therefore, the airline should still collect information to find the root cause, then remove it.


LO 1, AC 1.1

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gregg
1 months ago
Standards? More like standardized headaches if you ask me. But hey, at least it keeps the bureaucrats busy, right?
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
5 days ago
True, standards can be a real pain sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
9 days ago
B) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
10 days ago
A) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
1 months ago
I'm going with option D. Standards are like trying to herd cats - they're always open to interpretation and just lead to more confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
1 months ago
Haha, the whole thing is a mess! Maybe they should just throw the standards out the window and let the suppliers do whatever they want. That would be innovative, right?
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
6 days ago
C) Standards don't allow the buyers to add health and safety requirements into the specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
6 days ago
C) Standards don't allow the buyers to add health and safety requirements into the specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
7 days ago
B) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
9 days ago
B) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 months ago
A) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 months ago
A) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larae
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the right answer. Time is money, and standards just slow down the whole process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Standards can stifle innovation and make the specification process too rigid.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
12 days ago
But don't you think standards also provide a baseline for quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
15 days ago
I agree, standards can definitely hinder innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
But on the other hand, standards provide a common framework for everyone to work from, ensuring consistency and quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
I agree with you, Novella. Standards can limit creativity and new ideas in specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
I think one disadvantage of using standards is that they can be rigid and not encourage innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel