New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M2 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 4
[All L4M2 Questions]

One of the disadvantages of using standards in specification is that...

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Cracks on the jet engine is a closed-end problem. A typical problem solving process has 8 steps:

Step 1: Define the Problem

- What is the problem?

- How did you discover the problem?

- When did the problem start and how long has this problem been going on?

- Is there enough data available to contain the problem and prevent it from getting passed to the next process step? If yes, contain the problem.

Step 2: Clarify the Problem

- What data is available or needed to help clarify, or fully understand the problem?

- Is it a top priority to resolve the problem at this point in time?

- Are additional resources required to clarify the problem? If yes, elevate the problem to your leader to help locate the right resources and form a team.

- Consider a Lean Event (Do-it, Burst, RPI, Project).

- Ensure the problem is contained and does not get passed to the next process step.

Step 3: Define the Goals

- What is your end goal or desired future state?

- What will you accomplish if you fix this problem?

- What is the desired timeline for solving this problem?

Step 4: Identify Root Cause of the Problem

- Identify possible causes of the problem.

- Prioritize possible root causes of the problem.

- What information or data is there to validate the root cause?

Step 5: Develop Action Plan

- Generate a list of actions required to address the root cause and prevent problem from getting to others.

- Assign an owner and timeline to each action.

- Status actions to ensure completion.

Step 6: Execute Action Plan

- Implement action plan to address the root cause.

- Verify actions are completed.

Step 7: Evaluate the Results

- Monitor and Collect Data.

- Did you meet your goals defined in step 3? If not, repeate th 8-Step Process.

- Were there any unforeseen consequences?

- If problem is resolved, remove activities that were added previously to contain the problem.

Step 8: Continuously Improve

- Look for additional opportunities to implement solution.

- Ensure problem will not come back and communicate lessons learned.

- If needed, repeat the 8-Step Problem Solving Process to drive further improvements.

ANA has already known what is going on, the next step they should adopt is collecting more infor-mation on the problem. If the airline is hurry to the solution, it may choose 'Generate options ad-dressing the issue'. The crack on turbine blade can be welded, or the airline replaces a new blade. However, jumping to solution without knowing the root cause does not completely solve the prob-lem. The root cause is unaddressed, then it may occur in the future. Therefore, the airline should still collect information to find the root cause, then remove it.


LO 1, AC 1.1

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lai
3 months ago
Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
3 months ago
Standards don't allow buyers to add health and safety requirements? That's concerning!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
4 months ago
Wait, are standards really that ambiguous? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
4 months ago
Totally agree, they can really slow things down!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
4 months ago
Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
4 months ago
I thought standards were supposed to help with safety, so C seems off to me. But I could be wrong about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the rigidity of standards is a common concern, so I might lean towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like standards could actually help with clarity, not cause confusion. Maybe D isn't right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
5 months ago
I remember discussing how standards can sometimes limit creativity, so I think option B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
5 months ago
I'm confident that the correct answer is B. Standards often don't leave much room for flexibility or new ideas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
5 months ago
Option B looks like the best answer to me - standards can stifle creativity and prevent companies from trying new approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the main drawbacks of using standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key disadvantages of using standards in specifications, like rigidity and lack of innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. A service template would let you share an identical service configuration across tenants, which is option D. And it could also be used to apply the same QoS config to multiple CPEs, which is option B. I feel good about those two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
Sunk costs are past costs that shouldn't be included in future cash flow projections, so C is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The EgrLbl is the egress label, which is used for VPLS traffic forwarding. If it's missing, that suggests an issue with the VPLS peering or configuration. I'll review the answer choices and see which one best fits the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think on-demand scanning is definitely a feature, but I'm not as confident about the other one. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The Probe tool is something we covered briefly, but I don't feel super confident in my understanding of its exact capabilities. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
5 months ago
Ugh, I'm drawing a blank on this. Payments over a set period of time... is it something to do with amortization? I'll have to guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
10 months ago
Standards? More like standardized headaches if you ask me. But hey, at least it keeps the bureaucrats busy, right?
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
9 months ago
True, standards can be a real pain sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
9 months ago
B) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
9 months ago
A) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
10 months ago
I'm going with option D. Standards are like trying to herd cats - they're always open to interpretation and just lead to more confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
10 months ago
Haha, the whole thing is a mess! Maybe they should just throw the standards out the window and let the suppliers do whatever they want. That would be innovative, right?
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
9 months ago
C) Standards don't allow the buyers to add health and safety requirements into the specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
9 months ago
C) Standards don't allow the buyers to add health and safety requirements into the specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
9 months ago
B) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
9 months ago
B) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
9 months ago
A) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
10 months ago
A) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larae
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the right answer. Time is money, and standards just slow down the whole process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
10 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Standards can stifle innovation and make the specification process too rigid.
upvoted 0 times
Micah
8 months ago
I see your point, it's a fine balance between standardization and innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
8 months ago
That's true, but sometimes they can be too rigid and limit creativity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
9 months ago
But don't you think standards also provide a baseline for quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
9 months ago
I agree, standards can definitely hinder innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
11 months ago
But on the other hand, standards provide a common framework for everyone to work from, ensuring consistency and quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
I agree with you, Novella. Standards can limit creativity and new ideas in specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
11 months ago
I think one disadvantage of using standards is that they can be rigid and not encourage innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel