Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 28 Discussion

Posted by Kristeen on Feb 09, 2024 at 08:10 AM

One of the disadvantages of using standards in specification is that...

Suggested Answer: A

Cracks on the jet engine is a closed-end problem. A typical problem solving process has 8 steps:

Step 1: Define the Problem

- What is the problem?

- How did you discover the problem?

- When did the problem start and how long has this problem been going on?

- Is there enough data available to contain the problem and prevent it from getting passed to the next process step? If yes, contain the problem.

Step 2: Clarify the Problem

- What data is available or needed to help clarify, or fully understand the problem?

- Is it a top priority to resolve the problem at this point in time?

- Are additional resources required to clarify the problem? If yes, elevate the problem to your leader to help locate the right resources and form a team.

- Consider a Lean Event (Do-it, Burst, RPI, Project).

- Ensure the problem is contained and does not get passed to the next process step.

Step 3: Define the Goals

- What is your end goal or desired future state?

- What will you accomplish if you fix this problem?

- What is the desired timeline for solving this problem?

Step 4: Identify Root Cause of the Problem

- Identify possible causes of the problem.

- Prioritize possible root causes of the problem.

- What information or data is there to validate the root cause?

Step 5: Develop Action Plan

- Generate a list of actions required to address the root cause and prevent problem from getting to others.

- Assign an owner and timeline to each action.

- Status actions to ensure completion.

Step 6: Execute Action Plan

- Implement action plan to address the root cause.

- Verify actions are completed.

Step 7: Evaluate the Results

- Monitor and Collect Data.

- Did you meet your goals defined in step 3? If not, repeate th 8-Step Process.

- Were there any unforeseen consequences?

- If problem is resolved, remove activities that were added previously to contain the problem.

Step 8: Continuously Improve

- Look for additional opportunities to implement solution.

- Ensure problem will not come back and communicate lessons learned.

- If needed, repeat the 8-Step Problem Solving Process to drive further improvements.

ANA has already known what is going on, the next step they should adopt is collecting more infor-mation on the problem. If the airline is hurry to the solution, it may choose 'Generate options ad-dressing the issue'. The crack on turbine blade can be welded, or the airline replaces a new blade. However, jumping to solution without knowing the root cause does not completely solve the prob-lem. The root cause is unaddressed, then it may occur in the future. Therefore, the airline should still collect information to find the root cause, then remove it.


LO 1, AC 1.1

Get Premium L4M2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
LA
Lai 11 months ago
Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification.
ME
Mee 12 months ago
Standards don't allow buyers to add health and safety requirements? That's concerning!
HI
Hillary 12 months ago
Wait, are standards really that ambiguous? Sounds off.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
Totally agree, they can really slow things down!
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation.
JO
Johana 1 year ago
I thought standards were supposed to help with safety, so C seems off to me. But I could be wrong about that.
DO
Domonique 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the rigidity of standards is a common concern, so I might lean towards B.
TI
Tijuana 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like standards could actually help with clarity, not cause confusion. Maybe D isn't right?
JA
Janine 1 year ago
I remember discussing how standards can sometimes limit creativity, so I think option B makes sense.
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
I'm confident that the correct answer is B. Standards often don't leave much room for flexibility or new ideas.
DA
Darnell 1 year ago
Option B looks like the best answer to me - standards can stifle creativity and prevent companies from trying new approaches.
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the main drawbacks of using standards.
RO
Rosann 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key disadvantages of using standards in specifications, like rigidity and lack of innovation.
LI
Lizbeth 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. A service template would let you share an identical service configuration across tenants, which is option D. And it could also be used to apply the same QoS config to multiple CPEs, which is option B. I feel good about those two.
PA
Paulina 1 year ago
Sunk costs are past costs that shouldn't be included in future cash flow projections, so C is the right answer here.
CL
Clemencia 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The EgrLbl is the egress label, which is used for VPLS traffic forwarding. If it's missing, that suggests an issue with the VPLS peering or configuration. I'll review the answer choices and see which one best fits the scenario.
BO
Bobbie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think on-demand scanning is definitely a feature, but I'm not as confident about the other one. I'll have to think this through carefully.
RO
Rosendo 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The Probe tool is something we covered briefly, but I don't feel super confident in my understanding of its exact capabilities. I'll have to think this through carefully.
AS
Ashleigh 1 year ago
Ugh, I'm drawing a blank on this. Payments over a set period of time... is it something to do with amortization? I'll have to guess on this one.
GR
Gregg 1 year ago
Standards? More like standardized headaches if you ask me. But hey, at least it keeps the bureaucrats busy, right?
CH
Cheryl 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gregg
True, standards can be a real pain sometimes.
VO
Vonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gregg
B) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
SH
Shenika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gregg
A) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
GA
Gary 2 years ago
I'm going with option D. Standards are like trying to herd cats - they're always open to interpretation and just lead to more confusion.
GE
Gertude 2 years ago
Haha, the whole thing is a mess! Maybe they should just throw the standards out the window and let the suppliers do whatever they want. That would be innovative, right?
AS
Ashton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
C) Standards don't allow the buyers to add health and safety requirements into the specification
DE
Deonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
C) Standards don't allow the buyers to add health and safety requirements into the specification
OS
Osvaldo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
B) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
CO
Corazon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
B) Standards tend to be rigid and they often don't encourage innovation
YO
Youlanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
A) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
MI
Miles 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gertude
A) Standards lengthen the time to produce a specification
LA
Larae 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the right answer. Time is money, and standards just slow down the whole process.
DA
Dawne 2 years ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Standards can stifle innovation and make the specification process too rigid.
MI
Micah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dawne
I see your point, it's a fine balance between standardization and innovation.
TA
Tashia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dawne
That's true, but sometimes they can be too rigid and limit creativity.
TA
Taryn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dawne
But don't you think standards also provide a baseline for quality?
FL
Fletcher 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dawne
I agree, standards can definitely hinder innovation.
EL
Ellsworth 2 years ago
But on the other hand, standards provide a common framework for everyone to work from, ensuring consistency and quality.
GE
Gerald 2 years ago
I agree with you, Novella. Standards can limit creativity and new ideas in specifications.
NO
Novella 2 years ago
I think one disadvantage of using standards is that they can be rigid and not encourage innovation.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel