New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M2 Exam - Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M2 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All L4M2 Questions]

Which of the following are likely to be disadvantages of using outcome-based specifications? Select THREE that apply

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, F

An Outcome Based Specification (OBS) focuses on the desired outcome of a service in business terms, rather than a detailed technical specification of how the service is to be provided; this allows providers scope to propose innovative solutions that might not have occurred to the procurement team. Outcome should be distinguished from output, which is the measurable results of a set of inputs. The example of difference between outcome and output is written at the bottom of page 123 in the study guide.

Outcomes should be the starting point in making new specification. However, using outcome-based specification has some setbacks:

- First, it is not easy to measure the outcomes. Usually, outcome of a project is a statement like 'increase customer satisfaction', 'maintain ambient temperature' or 'provide a convenient way to do something'. They are not easy to measure as output.

- Second, sometimes the desired outcomes require time to be materialised

- Third, outcomes can be ambiguous


LO3, AC 3.1

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chandra
5 days ago
I agree, A is definitely time consuming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
11 days ago
I think A, B, and C are the main issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
16 days ago
E) Responsibility for product failure falling to buyer? That's unfair!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
21 days ago
D) Long time delay between action and result can be a real issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
26 days ago
C) Difficulty to measure performance? Sounds right, but how bad is it really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 month ago
I think B) Stifling innovation is a bit exaggerated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
1 month ago
Haha, outcome-based specs? More like outcome-based chaos. I'll take B, E, and F, please.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
1 month ago
A, C, and F. Producing these things must be a nightmare. And good luck trying to figure out if you actually met the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
Outcome-based specs? More like outcome-based headaches. B, D, and F for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
2 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about ambiguity, so F might also be a disadvantage, but I'm not completely confident about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B, stifling innovation, could be a concern if the specifications are too rigid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
C, D, and E. Measuring performance? Forget about it. And the buyer's responsible? No way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
2 months ago
A, B, and F. Outcome-based specs are a pain, man. Who wants to deal with that ambiguity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
2 months ago
A) Time consuming to produce is definitely a downside.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
3 months ago
I think C makes sense too, since measuring performance can be tricky with these types of specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
3 months ago
I remember discussing how outcome-based specs can be time-consuming to produce, so I think A is definitely one of the disadvantages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
3 months ago
Ugh, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through the potential issues with outcome-based specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
4 months ago
This is a good question. I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
4 months ago
I've got a strategy - I'll read through each option and try to identify which ones seem like potential downsides of the approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure time-consuming and stifling innovation are two of the disadvantages, but I'm not sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
4 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the pros and cons of outcome-based specs.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
3 months ago
What about E? That seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel