Which of the following might be consequences of over-specification? Select TWO that apply:
Suggested Answer: B, D
Get Premium L4M2 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Over-specification can cause problems to buying organisation, include the following:
- Higher expense due to unnecessary features embedded into the product
- Stifle competition because higher requirements will lead to fewer suppliers in the market are able to supply
- Harder to evaluate the trade-offs between different features and attributes in the specification
LO 3, AC 3.3
28 comments · newest first
AN
An
8 months ago
D could happen too. Focusing too much on details might miss the essentials.
DO
Dominque
8 months ago
C is definitely true. It can scare off suppliers.
WI
Wilda
9 months ago
I agree, B makes sense. Extra features just add to the budget.
PU
Pura
9 months ago
Wait, is it really possible to limit competition like that? Sounds odd!
MA
Magda
9 months ago
A is definitely a benefit, but B is a big downside.
LI
Lindy
9 months ago
I’m not so sure about D. Can you really lack essential features?
TO
Toshia
9 months ago
Totally agree, over-specification can really drive up costs!
SH
Shayne
9 months ago
B and C seem right to me.
AI
Aileen
10 months ago
Haha, over-specification sounds like a fancy way of saying "gold-plating." Gotta watch out for that!
RO
Rolf
10 months ago
Limiting competition? That's a sneaky one. Didn't think of that, but it makes sense.
BR
Brice
10 months ago
D) Lack of essential features is also a potential consequence. Gotta make sure you don't miss the important stuff!
MA
Mammie
10 months ago
Over-specification can definitely lead to higher costs. Who wants to pay for features they don't even need?
ZA
Zack
10 months ago
B) Higher cost due to inessential features and C) Limiting competition in supply market are the correct answers.
DO
Dorothy
10 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like limiting competition could be a consequence too. Maybe C is correct?
KI
Kizzy
11 months ago
I think B and C are the right choices. Over-specification can lead to higher costs.
IS
Isaac
11 months ago
I’m confused about A. Reducing motion waste seems like a positive outcome, but I guess it could be affected by over-specification in some cases.
PU
Pura
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think over-specification might also lead to a lack of essential features, so D could be a possibility.
LI
Lisbeth
11 months ago
I remember discussing how over-specification can lead to higher costs, so I think B is definitely one of the answers.
SE
Sean
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know over-specification can be bad, but I'm not totally sure about all the potential consequences. Guess I'll just have to make my best guess and move on.
MA
Marci
12 months ago
Piece of cake! Over-specification means you're adding unnecessary stuff, so that's gonna drive up the costs. And it could also restrict the supply market. Easy peasy.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. Over-specification could limit competition, which is no good. And it might also lead to a lack of essential features. Those are the two I'm going with.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. Over-specification could lead to higher costs, that's for sure. But what about the other options? Gotta make sure I pick the right two.
LA
Lavera
1 year ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the potential consequences of over-specification. Gotta make sure I don't miss any key points.
JI
Jina
7 months ago
Over-specification can really mess things up if you're not careful!
AR
Arlean
7 months ago
True, but I feel like the cost aspect is more obvious.
LO
Louvenia
7 months ago
What about lack of essential features? That could happen too.
VI
Vince
8 months ago
Yeah, and limiting competition in the supply market makes sense too.
AM
Amber
11 months ago
I think higher cost due to inessential features is definitely one.