Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L3M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

The principle that organisations responsible for creating pollution should be made financially liable for remedial action, is called:
A) Polluter pays
B) Clean-up costs
C) Consumer wins
D) Consumer pays

CIPS L3M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L3M5 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 4
[All L3M5 Questions]

The principle that organisations responsible for creating pollution should be made financially liable for remedial action, is called:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Polluter pays


by Ardella at Sep 15, 2024, 02:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L3M5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gearldine
9 months ago
Yeah, I've heard of this before, it's a crucial concept!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
9 months ago
I thought it was just about clean-up costs, not a principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
10 months ago
Wait, is that really the official term? Sounds kinda vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Totally agree, makes sense to hold polluters accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
10 months ago
It's definitely called the "Polluter pays" principle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
10 months ago
I think it’s A too, but I remember a question where "Consumer pays" was mentioned in a different context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
I definitely recall "Polluter pays" being a key concept, but I’m a bit confused about the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like "Clean-up costs" could be related. We had a practice question about financial responsibility for pollution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
11 months ago
I think the answer is A, Polluter pays. I remember studying that principle in environmental law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the options. "Consumer wins" and "Consumer pays" both sound like they could be related to the principle, but I think the key is that the responsibility lies with the organization that created the pollution, not the consumer. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The options seem a bit tricky - "Clean-up costs" and "Consumer pays" both sound related, but I think the key is that the polluter should be the one held responsible financially.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is the "Polluter pays" principle, since the question is asking about the principle that organizations responsible for pollution should be financially liable for fixing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking about the principle that says polluters should pay for the damage they cause, so the right answer has to be "Polluter pays". I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
2 years ago
Consumer wins? Hah, more like the environment wins when polluters get their due. A is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
2 years ago
B) Clean-up costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
2 years ago
Exactly, the polluter should be financially responsible for the pollution they create.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
2 years ago
A) Polluter pays
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jennie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's between A) Polluter pays and B) Clean-up costs. Can someone explain the difference?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
2 years ago
I agree with Tamesha, because it makes sense for the ones causing pollution to be responsible for cleaning it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 years ago
Clean-up costs? More like 'clean-up catastrophe' if you ask me. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Franchesca
2 years ago
Absolutely, it's the principle that makes the most sense in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 years ago
A) Polluter pays
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
2 years ago
Yes, it's definitely a catastrophe when it comes to cleaning up pollution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
2 years ago
B) Clean-up costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 years ago
I agree, the polluter should definitely be held financially responsible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 years ago
A) Polluter pays
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamesha
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Polluter pays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 years ago
Ah, the old 'polluter pays' principle. Finally, some accountability for those eco-offenders!
upvoted 0 times
Charlette
2 years ago
I agree, it's only fair that they cover the costs of cleaning up their mess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 years ago
B) Clean-up costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
2 years ago
Exactly! It's about time they take responsibility for their actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 years ago
A) Polluter pays
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel