CIPS believes that it is good practice for different staff members to be responsible for three key ac-tivities in procurement (specifying / requisitioning; sourcing / contracting; authorising payment), in order to reduce the likelihood of malpractice, and to do what is in the best interests of the organisa-tion. Select two of the following terms which this principle is known by.
Suggested Answer: A, B
Get Premium L3M4 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Segregation or separation of duties - making different people / line managers responsible for differ-ent stages of the process, making it less likely that fraud can occur.
12 comments · newest first
JO
Johanna
2 months ago
I feel like both terms fit. Reduces risk for the organization.
SO
Solange
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Separation of duties too. Keeps things clear.
JU
Junita
3 months ago
I think it's called Segregation of duties. Makes sense.
PU
Pura
3 months ago
Definitely segregation of duties, it helps prevent fraud!
HE
Heidy
3 months ago
I thought it was just about teamwork, not splitting tasks like that.
LO
Lonna
3 months ago
Wait, is severance of duties even a real term?
AV
Avery
4 months ago
Totally agree, separation of duties is key for transparency.
LA
Lamonica
4 months ago
It's called segregation of duties!
KA
Karima
4 months ago
I definitely recall "segregation of duties" being emphasized as a key principle in procurement. The other options seem less relevant to me.
CO
Cora
4 months ago
I feel like "severance of duties" was mentioned in one of our readings, but it doesn't seem right for this context.
JA
Jade
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think "separation of duties" could also be correct. It sounds similar to what we practiced in the mock exams.
ME
Meaghan
4 months ago
I remember discussing this in class, and I think it might be called "segregation of duties." It makes sense to have different people handling those tasks to prevent fraud.