MENU
Which of the following is unlikely to be regarded as a conformance specification?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium L3M3 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Outputs link to the concept of a performance (or 'output') specification, not a conformance specifi-cation.
28 comments · newest first
JE
Jestine
7 months ago
A) A chemical formula seems too precise to be non-conformance.
DA
Davida
8 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't specify how to conform.
KI
Kirk
8 months ago
I think D) A brand name is the answer.
LO
Loren
8 months ago
Totally agree, a statement of outputs fits the bill!
KA
Kati
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems odd.
RA
Raylene
9 months ago
Brand names? Not a spec at all!
EM
Emily
9 months ago
I think drawings can also be considered specs.
JU
Judy
9 months ago
A brand name? Really? That's about as far from a conformance spec as you can get!
SH
Sheron
9 months ago
Hmm, I'd say A) A chemical formula is the most technical of the options.
LE
Leota
9 months ago
C) Drawings could be considered a conformance specification, depending on the context.
KA
Karl
10 months ago
I agree, a brand name doesn't really specify the technical requirements.
RA
Ramonita
10 months ago
D) A brand name is the most unlikely to be regarded as a conformance specification.
RA
Rana
10 months ago
I could be wrong, but I think a statement of outputs might not fit the definition of conformance either.
OL
Olga
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify specifications, and I feel like drawings are definitely conformance specs.
GE
Gertude
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about chemical formulas being more about composition than conformance.
LO
Lovetta
11 months ago
A chemical formula is definitely a conformance spec.
CA
Caprice
11 months ago
I agree, B) A statement of outputs is also clear.
OC
Octavio
11 months ago
I think a brand name is unlikely to be a conformance specification because it doesn't specify how something should be made.
GE
Genevive
12 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy. I'll eliminate the options that clearly don't fit, then focus on the trickier ones. Gotta stay calm and use the process of elimination.
RO
Ronald
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I think I need to review my notes on conformance specs before attempting to answer.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
I've got a hunch that the brand name option is the least likely to be a conformance spec, but I'll double-check my understanding just to be sure.
TO
Toshia
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. A chemical formula seems like it could be a conformance spec, but I'm not sure. Drawings and brand names are less clear to me.
SU
Susana
1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about what a conformance specification really means.
CH
Charlie
7 months ago
Agreed! It's more about identity than conformance.
MA
Matthew
7 months ago
Drawings could be too, but a brand name? No way.
BE
Bettye
10 months ago
A chemical formula is definitely a conformance spec.
DA
Dalene
11 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't specify anything technical.
ME
Merrilee
11 months ago
I think a brand name is unlikely to be a conformance specification.