Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L3M3 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L3M3 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 4
[All L3M3 Questions]

Which of the following is unlikely to be regarded as a conformance specification?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Outputs link to the concept of a performance (or 'output') specification, not a conformance specifi-cation.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jestine
17 days ago
A) A chemical formula seems too precise to be non-conformance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
22 days ago
Yeah, it doesn't specify how to conform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
27 days ago
I think D) A brand name is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
2 months ago
Totally agree, a statement of outputs fits the bill!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
2 months ago
Brand names? Not a spec at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
2 months ago
I think drawings can also be considered specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
A brand name? Really? That's about as far from a conformance spec as you can get!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd say A) A chemical formula is the most technical of the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
C) Drawings could be considered a conformance specification, depending on the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
3 months ago
I agree, a brand name doesn't really specify the technical requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
3 months ago
D) A brand name is the most unlikely to be regarded as a conformance specification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
3 months ago
I could be wrong, but I think a statement of outputs might not fit the definition of conformance either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify specifications, and I feel like drawings are definitely conformance specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about chemical formulas being more about composition than conformance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
4 months ago
A chemical formula is definitely a conformance spec.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
4 months ago
I agree, B) A statement of outputs is also clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
5 months ago
I think a brand name is unlikely to be a conformance specification because it doesn't specify how something should be made.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
5 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy. I'll eliminate the options that clearly don't fit, then focus on the trickier ones. Gotta stay calm and use the process of elimination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I think I need to review my notes on conformance specs before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
5 months ago
I've got a hunch that the brand name option is the least likely to be a conformance spec, but I'll double-check my understanding just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. A chemical formula seems like it could be a conformance spec, but I'm not sure. Drawings and brand names are less clear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
6 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about what a conformance specification really means.
upvoted 0 times
Charlie
6 days ago
Agreed! It's more about identity than conformance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
12 days ago
Drawings could be too, but a brand name? No way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
4 months ago
A chemical formula is definitely a conformance spec.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't specify anything technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
4 months ago
I think a brand name is unlikely to be a conformance specification.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel