A UK manufacturing company has simultaneously:
* purchased a put option to sell USD 1million at an exercise price of GBP1.00 = USD1.65
* sold a call option that grants the option holder the right to buy USD 1million at a price of GBP1.00 = USD1.61(this option has the same maturity date as the put).
Which of the following is a valid explanation for entering into these option positions?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
PA
Pa
2 months ago
I lean towards option D. Extra protection is crucial for payments.
LI
Linn
2 months ago
I disagree. Option C is better. They can benefit if USD strengthens.
LY
Lynelle
2 months ago
I think option A makes sense. They want to hedge their USD income.
KE
Keena
2 months ago
Wait, how does offsetting premiums even work in this case?
AI
Ailene
2 months ago
D) sounds right, they need protection against a stronger USD.
LA
Lawana
2 months ago
C) is interesting, but why would they want to sell a call then?
ZE
Zena
3 months ago
I disagree, B) is more likely since they might be paying a supplier.
GA
Garry
3 months ago
A) makes sense if they're expecting to receive USD.
DE
Delmy
3 months ago
I recall something about using options to offset costs, so maybe option B is right, but it seems a bit off since they’re selling a call.
LE
Letha
3 months ago
I feel like option C could also be valid since they might want to benefit if the USD strengthens, but I'm not completely confident.
LE
Leatha
3 months ago
I think option A makes sense because if they're expecting to receive USD, they would want to protect that amount with the put.
KE
Kent
3 months ago
I remember we discussed how companies use options to hedge against currency fluctuations, but I'm not sure which option fits best here.