I'm pretty sure this is a change in accounting estimate. The company is updating its estimate of future warranty costs based on a production improvement, which doesn't seem to be a change in principle or a correction of an error. I'll select option B.
I think the divisional structure would be the best fit here. Differentiation at the business level usually requires more flexibility and autonomy, which a divisional structure can provide.
I've got a strategy for this. I'll focus on finding the right Activity element in XML Document 2 based on the Code attribute, then update its Status element accordingly. Gotta be careful with the namespace-aware parsing.
Shareholders responsible for risk management? What is this, a comedy show? They're just there to make money, not to run the company. Definitely going with Option A.
Only managers and directors? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. Everyone in the entity should be involved in risk management, from the CEO to the janitor. Option A is the way to go.
I think the board of directors should be responsible for risk management. They're the ones calling the shots, so they should be the ones managing the risks too. Option B for me.
I think every member of the entity should be responsible for risk management. It's important for everyone to be aware of and involved in managing risks.
Well, the COSO ERM Framework clearly states that risk management is the responsibility of everyone in the organization, not just the board or managers. Option A seems like the right choice here.
Cyril
4 days agoKenneth
5 days agoSalome
6 days agoFranchesca
8 days agoStevie
5 months agoNoemi
5 months agoDylan
5 months agoCorinne
4 months agoDesmond
4 months agoJoseph
4 months agoPamela
4 months agoDominque
5 months agoRolande
3 months agoPhung
4 months agoFrance
4 months agoAn
5 months agoLore
4 months agoBrendan
4 months agoMichal
4 months agoChun
6 months agoMarylyn
6 months agoChun
6 months ago