Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRO19-P01-1 Topic 9 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P01-1 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 9
[All CIMAPRO19-P01-1 Questions]

The inventory level of Product Y has reduced by 40 units over a single period. The cost card for Product Y is as follows:

The profit for Product Y using marginal costing is $26,000.

If the company used absorption costing, what would the profit for Product Y be?

Give your answer to the nearest whole $.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D, E, G

References:


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tom
1 months ago
I heard the exam committee is considering a new question: 'If a production manager drops a box of inventory, how many units are considered 'lost' for accounting purposes?'
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
1 months ago
I bet the person who wrote this question is laughing at us right now, trying to trip us up with all these cost accounting concepts. Joke's on them, I'm going to crush this exam!
upvoted 0 times
My
7 days ago
A) $24600
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kina
1 months ago
I'm just gonna go with the lowest answer option, that's always a safe bet, right? Just kidding, I know I need to put some real thought into this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
1 months ago
Hmm, $26,000 under marginal costing, but what about that fixed overhead? This is where the absorption costing calculation comes into play.
upvoted 0 times
Floyd
17 days ago
So, the profit would be lower compared to marginal costing due to the inclusion of fixed overhead costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
18 days ago
That's right, absorption costing takes into account fixed overhead costs which are included in the cost of goods sold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
18 days ago
Under absorption costing, the profit for Product Y would be $24,600.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosann
2 months ago
I can see why this question is tricky. The key is to remember that absorption costing includes fixed overhead, while marginal costing doesn't. Gotta make sure to factor that in.
upvoted 0 times
Gladis
16 days ago
Exactly, so we need to factor that in when calculating the profit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
28 days ago
That makes sense, absorption costing includes fixed overhead costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
1 months ago
I think the profit for Product Y using absorption costing would be $24,600.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 months ago
A) $24600
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alishia
3 months ago
I'm not sure about this. Can someone explain why absorption costing would result in a lower profit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
3 months ago
I agree with Rosendo. Absorption costing includes fixed overhead costs, so the profit would be lower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
I think the profit for Product Y using absorption costing would be $24,600.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel