MENU
GHY is a listed company. Tom isGHY'sCEO and Peter isitsnon-executive Chair of the Board. Tom and Peterbothhave substantial relevant business and industrial experience andboth are believed to have considerable integrity. Tom and Peter quickly developed a good working relationship after Peter's appointment. They have become close friends.
Tom briefs Peter on every aspect of the business. Tom and Peter jointlyagreethe agenda foreveryboard meetingandboth agree on the manner in which matterswill be presented to theboard.
Taking account of the principles of goodcorporategovernance, which of the following statements is correct?
Suggested Answer: B, C, E
Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
SH
Sheridan
11 months ago
D is a bit optimistic, isn't it? Dominance can sneak in unnoticed.
EL
Elenor
11 months ago
Non-contentious meetings can be misleading, though.
CA
Caprice
11 months ago
Really? I'm not sure if this is a good thing for unbiased decision-making.
RO
Rodolfo
12 months ago
I think it's great they have a good relationship! Cohesion is key.
LE
Leota
12 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of too much buddy-buddy in the boardroom.
CA
Carey
1 year ago
I recall that good governance requires transparency and objectivity. So, I lean towards option C as well, but I’m not completely confident.
RE
Remedios
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like close relationships between the CEO and Chair could lead to biased decision-making.
CA
Caitlin
1 year ago
I think I saw a similar question about board dynamics in our practice exams. It feels like option C might be the right choice here.
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of independence in board relationships. This situation seems to blur those lines a bit.
SH
Shawnna
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about the principles of good corporate governance, but there are a lot of nuances to consider. I'll need to re-read the passage carefully and make sure I understand the implications before selecting an answer.
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
Ah, this is a classic corporate governance scenario. The key is to identify any potential threats to the Board's ability to provide effective oversight and challenge management. I've got a good handle on this topic, so I'm feeling confident about answering this one.
MA
Margot
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. The close relationship between the CEO and Chair could undermine the independence of the Board, but it's not clear-cut. I'll need to think through the potential risks and benefits to make the right call.
BA
Barney
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward - the relationship between the CEO and Chair raises concerns about corporate governance and potential conflicts of interest. I'll need to carefully consider the principles of good governance to determine the best answer.
PE
Peggy
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the material again before deciding.
CA
Carmela
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Let me walk through the options systematically.
RI
Ricarda
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the impact of each profile on CPU load and server-side bandwidth.
AL
Alishia
1 year ago
The fact that Tom briefs Peter on every aspect of the business and they jointly agree on everything sounds a bit too cozy for my liking. I hope they don't start braiding each other's hair during the meetings.
WE
Wei
1 year ago
Wow, Tom and Peter are like the Siegfried and Roy of corporate governance! I hope they don't start performing any tiger acts in the boardroom.
AL
Alecia
1 year ago
C) The relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Board is not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.
CR
Cristina
1 year ago
B) Non-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
A) It is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company.
TA
Tawna
1 year ago
While a good working relationship is important, the fact that they jointly agree on the agenda and how matters are presented to the Board suggests a lack of independent oversight. This could be problematic.
MO
Mose
1 year ago
B) Non-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.
ER
Ernest
1 year ago
C) The relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Board is not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.
RI
Rikki
1 year ago
A) It is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company.
SE
Sena
2 years ago
The close relationship between Tom and Peter raises concerns about the objectivity and independence of the Board's decision-making process. The non-executive chair should maintain a certain distance to ensure proper oversight.
ZI
Zita
1 year ago
D) Since the non-executive chair clearly has a significant role within this company there is little danger that any individual will become excessively dominant.
HE
Helene
1 year ago
C) The relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Board is not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.
HE
Herschel
1 year ago
A) It is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company.
DW
Dwight
1 year ago
B) Non-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
C) The relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Board is not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.
CR
Craig
1 year ago
A) It is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company.
NA
Natalie
2 years ago
That's a valid point, Nidia. It's important for the board to be informed in an unbiased manner.
NI
Nidia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more accurate. Their close friendship could lead to biased decision making.
NA
Natalie
2 years ago
I think option A is correct. Tom and Peter's relationship seems beneficial for the company.