CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F03-1 exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 7

A company is considering a divestment via either a management buyout (MBO) or sale to a private equity purchaser. Which of the following is an argument in favour of the MBO from the viewpoint of the original company?

ABetter co-operation post divestment.

BEnhanced big data opportunities.

CImproved relationships with management buyout team in the event of a sale to the private equity purchaser.

DHigher price due to synergistic benefits.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Yong at Sep 15, 2024, 09:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elise

3 months ago

A is the way to go for smoother transitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammi

3 months ago

Surprised that D isn't the top choice!

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

3 months ago

C doesn't really make sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

4 months ago

I disagree, B seems more relevant nowadays.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

4 months ago

A is definitely a strong point for MBOs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tresa

4 months ago

I recall a practice question where we discussed synergies in MBOs. So, option D might be relevant, but I'm not confident it’s the best argument for the original company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francisca

4 months ago

I feel like option C could be a trick answer. It mentions improved relationships, but I don't see how that directly benefits the original company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how MBOs can sometimes lead to stronger commitment from the management team. Maybe that's related to option A?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

5 months ago

I think option A makes sense because MBOs often lead to better cooperation since the management team is already familiar with the company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

5 months ago

A seems like the best answer here. The original company would likely want to maintain a good working relationship with the management team post-divestment, so that's a key advantage of the MBO approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The options don't seem to clearly match up with the prompt. I'll need to re-read it a few times and think through the logic to decide which one makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards C, improved relationships with the management buyout team. That seems like it could be a key benefit for the original company in an MBO scenario. The other options don't seem as directly relevant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Onita

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The options don't seem to directly address the question of what's an argument in favor of the MBO from the original company's viewpoint. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is A, better co-operation post divestment. The MBO option would likely lead to better collaboration between the original company and the management team taking over the divested business.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernestine

1 year ago

Haha, B is just a random buzzword thrown in there to distract us. Nice try, but I'm not falling for that one!

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliseo

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm going to have to go with A. Keeping the management team motivated and engaged is key after a divestment.

upvoted 0 times

Virgie

1 year ago

That's a good point. Maintaining a good relationship with the management team can definitely benefit the original company in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

1 year ago

C) Improved relationships with management buyout team in the event of a sale to the private equity purchaser.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leila

1 year ago

A) Better co-operation post divestment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Camellia

1 year ago

C is just plain silly. Why would the original company care about their relationship with the MBO team if they're selling to a private equity firm?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

1 year ago

B is a bit out of left field. Big data has nothing to do with whether the company should choose an MBO or private equity sale.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shad

1 year ago

D seems like the best option to me. The synergistic benefits of the MBO should result in a higher price for the original company.

upvoted 0 times

Sheridan

1 year ago

Lai: It's important to consider all the potential benefits before making a decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

1 year ago

User 2: Definitely, higher price due to synergistic benefits is a strong argument in favor of the MBO.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

1 year ago

I agree, D does seem like the best option. The synergistic benefits could lead to a higher price.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

1 year ago

But what about option A? Better co-operation post divestment could also be beneficial for the original company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivette

1 year ago

I think the correct answer is A. The management team will likely be more invested in the success of the company post-divestment if they've bought it out themselves.

upvoted 0 times