CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F03-1 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 4

Company BBB has prepared a valuation of a competitor company, Company BBD. Company BBB is intending to acquire a controlling interest in the equity of Company BBD and therefore wants to value only the equity of Company BBD.

The directors of Company BBB have prepared the following valuation of Company BBD:

Value of Equity = 4.63 + 5.14 + 5.56 = S15.33 million

Additional information on Company BBD:

Which THREE of the following are weaknesses of the above valuation?

AFree cash flows to all investors should be discounted at the cost of equity of 10% rather than WACC of 8%.

BThe valuation is understated as forecast future growth has been ignored beyond year 3.

CThe valuation is understated as the directors have failed to include a perpetuity factor in the calculations.

DThe approach used calculates the value of the total entity not the value of equity.

EThe valuation is overstated as the directors have failed to deduct tax from the free cash flows.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C, D, E

by Kasandra at Sep 02, 2023, 03:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lindsay

3 months ago

Valuation total is $15.33 million, but future growth is ignored.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

3 months ago

I think the valuation might actually be overstated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

3 months ago

Wait, they didn't account for tax deductions? That's surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Katheryn

4 months ago

Agree, missing the perpetuity factor is a big oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

4 months ago

They should definitely use the cost of equity, not WACC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

4 months ago

I vaguely recall something about calculating the total entity value versus equity value. That could be a significant oversight in their approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

4 months ago

I feel like the perpetuity factor is crucial for long-term valuations. If they missed that, it could really affect the results.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think ignoring growth beyond year 3 could definitely understate the valuation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how using WACC instead of the cost of equity could lead to inaccuracies in equity valuation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

5 months ago

I feel confident I can identify the three main weaknesses here. The key is to carefully analyze the information given and not overlook any important details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iluminada

5 months ago

The part about ignoring future growth beyond year 3 and not including a perpetuity factor seems like a clear weakness in the valuation approach. I'll make sure to highlight those.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remedios

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the different discount rates mentioned. Should we be using the cost of equity or the WACC? That seems like an important detail to get right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the weaknesses of the valuation method used by Company BBB. I think I have a good handle on the key information provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points before attempting to answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kizzy

5 months ago

The perpetuity factor is an important consideration that I'll need to analyze carefully. I want to make sure I understand how that should be incorporated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

5 months ago

The question about ignoring future growth beyond year 3 is interesting. I'll need to consider how that could impact the valuation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the difference between discounting at the cost of equity versus WACC. I'll need to review that concept before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Letha

5 months ago

Okay, let me think through this. The valuation seems to be based on free cash flows, but there are some potential issues with the approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leoma

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the routing implications of the transit gateway and ECMP setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

5 months ago

Alright, let me think this through step-by-step. I need to find the option that allows me to update the Mappings while keeping the existing scenario's schedule intact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident on this one. Just-in-time procurement is all about minimizing inventory, so it's usually preceded by a ship-to-stock approach where you keep inventory on hand.

upvoted 0 times

...