Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 71 Discussion

Company C has received an unwelcome takeover bid from Company P.Company P is approximately twice the size of Company C based on market capitalisation.Although the two companies have some common business interests, the main aim of the bid is diversification for Company P.The offer from Company P is a share exchange of 2 shares in Company P for 3 shares in Company C.There is a cash alternative of $5.50 for each Company C share.Company C has substantial cash balances which the directors were planning to use to fund an acquisition.These plans have not been announced to the market.Thefollowing share price information is relevant. All prices are in $.Which of the following would be the most appropriate action by Company C's directors following receipt of this hostile bid?
A) Write to shareholders explaining fully why the company's share price is under valued.
B) Change the Articles of Association to increase the percentage of shareholder votes required to approve a takeover.
C) Pay a one-off special dividend.
D) Refer the bid to the country's competition authorities.

CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F03-1 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions]

Company C has received an unwelcome takeover bid from Company P.

Company P is approximately twice the size of Company C based on market capitalisation.

Although the two companies have some common business interests, the main aim of the bid is diversification for Company P.

The offer from Company P is a share exchange of 2 shares in Company P for 3 shares in Company C.

There is a cash alternative of $5.50 for each Company C share.

Company C has substantial cash balances which the directors were planning to use to fund an acquisition.

These plans have not been announced to the market.

Thefollowing share price information is relevant. All prices are in $.

Which of the following would be the most appropriate action by Company C's directors following receipt of this hostile bid?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Whitley at Jul 30, 2023, 02:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Henriette
10 months ago
Changing the Articles? That could backfire on them!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
10 months ago
Writing to shareholders sounds like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
10 months ago
A cash alternative of $5.50? Seems low for a takeover bid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
10 months ago
Totally agree, they need to act fast!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
10 months ago
Company P is way bigger, this could be tough for Company C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
Referring the bid to competition authorities could buy time, but I’m not convinced it would actually help Company C in the long run. It seems like a defensive but passive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
11 months ago
Paying a special dividend sounds appealing, especially with their cash reserves, but I wonder if it would really deter Company P. It feels like a short-term fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
11 months ago
I think changing the Articles of Association could be a strong defensive strategy, but I’m not clear on the legal implications of that. It seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
11 months ago
I remember discussing how undervalued shares can affect shareholder perception, so option A might be a good move. But I'm not entirely sure if it’s enough to fend off a hostile bid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
11 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I'll just follow the steps in the provided solution and get this done quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
11 months ago
Oh, I know RICES is a treatment method for injuries, but I can't remember exactly what each letter stands for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. The key things to consider are the limitations and scalability of VNet peering for transit use cases. I'll evaluate each option against those criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The answer is option A, "midcall-signallng passthru". This command will allow the Cisco Unified Border Element to pass through the mid-call signaling from the customer to the service provider, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
1 year ago
The directors better have a really good reason to keep all that cash hidden from the market. That's not going to fly!
upvoted 0 times
Carole
1 year ago
Let's consider all our options carefully before making a decision. We need to protect the interests of our shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 year ago
I agree, we can't just sit back and let them take over. We have to take action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
We need to come up with a plan fast. Company P is not playing around with this takeover bid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
1 year ago
Referring the bid to the competition authorities is the way to go. Let's see if they can poke some holes in this deal.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
1 year ago
Hopefully the competition authorities will investigate and provide some clarity on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
1 year ago
I think referring the bid to the competition authorities is a smart move to ensure fair competition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 year ago
Agreed, it's important to protect the interests of the company and its shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
A one-off special dividend? That's like bribing the shareholders to accept the hostile bid. Not cool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
1 year ago
Changing the Articles of Association to increase the percentage of shareholder votes required to approve a takeover seems like a sneaky way to block the bid.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
1 year ago
Referring the bid to competition authorities could also be a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 year ago
Maybe they should consider other options to protect the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
I agree, it could be seen as a defensive tactic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
1 year ago
That does seem like a sneaky move to block the bid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
Referring the bid to the competition authorities might be the best course of action to ensure fairness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
1 year ago
Paying a special dividend could also be a good way to appease shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
I think it's important for the directors to consider all their options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
That does seem like a sneaky move to block the bid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
1 year ago
The directors should fully explain to shareholders why the company's share price is undervalued. That's the most transparent approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
1 year ago
I believe Company C should also consider changing the Articles of Association to protect against future hostile takeovers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
1 year ago
I agree with you, Margery. It's important to ensure fair competition in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
1 year ago
I think Company C should refer the bid to the competition authorities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel