New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F03-1 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions]

An unlisted company is attempting to value its equity using the dividend valuationmodel.

Relevant information is as follows:

* A dividend of$500,000 has just been paid.

* Dividend growth of 8% is expected for the foreseeable future.

* Earnings growth of 6% is expected for the foreseeable future.

* The cost of equity of a proxy listed company is 15%.

* The risk premium required due tothe companybeing unlisted is 3%.

The calculationthat has been performedis as follows:

Equity value = $540,000 / (0.18 - 0.08) = $5,400,000

What is thefaultwith the calculation that has been performed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Ivan at Jul 12, 2025, 12:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Martina
2 months ago
Really? $540,000 for dividends? That seems like a mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
2 months ago
The dividend cash flow is fine, they just need to adjust the cost of equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
3 months ago
I agree, they messed up the cost of equity calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
3 months ago
Wait, how can they use a higher growth rate than earnings? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
3 months ago
The cost of equity should definitely be 12%, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
3 months ago
I recall that sometimes no adjustment is needed for the cost of equity, so option D could also be a possibility. But I'm not completely confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
4 months ago
I think we covered something about growth rates in class, and if earnings growth is lower than dividend growth, it could be problematic. So, option C might be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the dividend cash flow used should definitely be the one that was just paid, which is $500,000. That makes me lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
4 months ago
I remember we discussed how the cost of equity should reflect the risk premium for unlisted companies, so I think option A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
4 months ago
This looks straightforward enough. The cost of equity adjustment for being unlisted seems reasonable, so I'll focus on verifying the other inputs and the overall logic of the dividend valuation model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the dividend cash flow used in the calculation. Shouldn't it be the $500,000 that was just paid, not $540,000? I'll need to revisit that part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
Alright, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is properly adjusting the cost of equity for the company being unlisted. I'll work through that calculation carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
5 months ago
Okay, let me see here. The dividend growth rate seems higher than the earnings growth rate, so that's an immediate red flag. I'll need to double-check the assumptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the information provided and think through the dividend valuation model step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
6 months ago
The dividend cash flow used should be $500,000, not $540,000. I guess they just pulled that extra $40,000 out of thin air.
upvoted 0 times
Kasandra
5 months ago
A straightforward mistake overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
That extra $40,000 is confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
5 months ago
Definitely, it makes no sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
5 months ago
Should stick to the actual dividend amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dewitt
6 months ago
Wow, this company must be really good at magic to make their dividends grow faster than their earnings! I wonder if they have a unicorn in the backyard or something.
upvoted 0 times
Elouise
6 months ago
User 1: The cost of equity used in the calculation should have been 12% (15% subtract 3%).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelina
7 months ago
So, the correct answer is A) The cost of equity used in the calculation should have been 12% (15% subtract 3%).
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
7 months ago
Yes, but we need to adjust for the 3% risk premium due to the company being unlisted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
7 months ago
The dividend growth rate of 8% is way too high compared to the earnings growth rate of 6%. This is not sustainable in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
Gene
5 months ago
User 3: The cost of equity used in the calculation should have been 12%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that doesn't seem sustainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
5 months ago
User 1: The dividend growth rate is too high compared to earnings growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
7 months ago
The cost of equity should be 12%, not 15%. The 3% risk premium for being unlisted should be subtracted from the proxy company's cost of equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
7 months ago
But isn't the cost of equity of the proxy listed company 15%? So, shouldn't it be used in the calculation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
7 months ago
I agree with Mariann, the cost of equity should have been 12% instead of 15%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
8 months ago
I think the fault is with the cost of equity used in the calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel