Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Topic 1 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F03-1 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions]

An unlisted company is attempting to value its equity using the dividend valuationmodel.

Relevant information is as follows:

* A dividend of$500,000 has just been paid.

* Dividend growth of 8% is expected for the foreseeable future.

* Earnings growth of 6% is expected for the foreseeable future.

* The cost of equity of a proxy listed company is 15%.

* The risk premium required due tothe companybeing unlisted is 3%.

The calculationthat has been performedis as follows:

Equity value = $540,000 / (0.18 - 0.08) = $5,400,000

What is thefaultwith the calculation that has been performed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dewitt
18 days ago
Wow, this company must be really good at magic to make their dividends grow faster than their earnings! I wonder if they have a unicorn in the backyard or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
20 days ago
So, the correct answer is A) The cost of equity used in the calculation should have been 12% (15% subtract 3%).
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
22 days ago
Yes, but we need to adjust for the 3% risk premium due to the company being unlisted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
23 days ago
The dividend growth rate of 8% is way too high compared to the earnings growth rate of 6%. This is not sustainable in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
30 days ago
The cost of equity should be 12%, not 15%. The 3% risk premium for being unlisted should be subtracted from the proxy company's cost of equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 months ago
But isn't the cost of equity of the proxy listed company 15%? So, shouldn't it be used in the calculation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 months ago
I agree with Mariann, the cost of equity should have been 12% instead of 15%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
2 months ago
I think the fault is with the cost of equity used in the calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel