Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-F02-1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 120 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F02-1 exam
Question #: 120
Topic #: 2
[All CIMAPRA19-F02-1 Questions]

LM and JK operatein the same countryand prepare their financial statements to30 June 20X6 in accordance with International Accounting Standards. On 27 June 20X6 both entities raised $1 million cashby issuing debt instruments with identical terms and conditions. Prior to this issue both entities were financed entirely by equity.

At 30 June 20X6 the gearing ratios,calculatedasDebt/Equity x 100%, wereas follows:

LM: 30%

JK: 65%

Which of the following independent options would explain the difference between LM and JK's year-end gearing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elli at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-F02-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nydia
25 days ago
D is interesting, but I feel it’s less relevant to gearing differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
30 days ago
C makes sense too. The number of shares can change the gearing ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 month ago
I lean towards B. A bonus issue affects retained earnings and equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 month ago
I think A is the best choice. Revaluations can significantly impact equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
2 months ago
JK's higher gearing is surprising, especially with the same debt terms!
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
2 months ago
I doubt it's just about the shares; there must be more to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
2 months ago
Wait, how does a bonus issue affect gearing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
2 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
2 months ago
LM's gearing is way lower because of the revaluation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
2 months ago
I'm going with C. The different share structures are the most plausible explanation here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
3 months ago
Option B is interesting, but a bonus issue wouldn't change the debt-to-equity ratio, would it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
3 months ago
Haha, looks like JK really loaded up on that debt! 65% gearing, yikes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
3 months ago
I'm not sure about the revaluation options. Wouldn't that affect both companies equally?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
4 months ago
Option C seems the most likely explanation. The difference in the number of shares and their par value would definitely impact the gearing ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option D. I thought investments would only affect gearing if they were debt-related, but maybe revaluations can play a role too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
4 months ago
I recall a practice question where share structure affected ratios. Option C seems plausible since having more shares at a lower value could increase JK's gearing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think a bonus issue could dilute equity, which might affect gearing. So option B could be relevant, but I need to think it through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
4 months ago
I remember studying how revaluations can impact equity, so option A makes sense to me. If LM revalued its assets, that could lower its gearing ratio compared to JK.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
This is a good test of our understanding of gearing ratios and how they are calculated. I'm going to carefully work through the calculations for each option to see which one aligns with the given information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Are we supposed to choose the option that best explains the difference, or the one that is the actual reason? I want to make sure I understand the task correctly before I commit to an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
I think I've got it! The difference in the number of shares and their par values between the two companies must be the reason for the different gearing ratios. Option C seems to be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key details are that both companies raised $1 million in debt and were previously financed entirely by equity. So the difference in gearing must be due to something else. I'll need to analyze each option closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the information provided and think through the different options to determine which one best explains the difference in gearing ratios.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawn
19 days ago
I think option A makes sense. Revaluations can really impact equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel