Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA19-E03-1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 72 Discussion

Posted by Salena on Aug 09, 2023 at 11:50 AM

LLL is an international oil and gas exploration company. It is considering investing S300 million in developing new oil fields in Country D. For this it will need to obtain a license from the government of Country D.

These new oil fields will bring much wealth to Country D because a large proportion of the revenue from the production of oil will be paid to the government as part of the licensing agreement.

However, oil production in Country D will have some undesirable social effects, such as the threat of pollution, congestion to the roads and pressure on local amenities such as housing, electricity and clean water.

Which of the following approaches to stakeholder management should LLL NOT undertake in order to enter Country D?

Suggested Answer: A, C

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-E03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
VE
Veta 11 months ago
Stakeholder mapping is crucial, but free shares? That's risky!
FI
Filiberto 11 months ago
A promotional video? Really? That won't change the local impact.
SY
Sylvie 12 months ago
Agree, they should focus on local improvements instead.
BR
Brendan 12 months ago
Sounds like a bad idea, pollution will be a huge issue.
AN
Annita 1 year ago
LLL needs that license to operate in Country D.
AN
Antonette 1 year ago
Developing a promotional video sounds like a way to sway public opinion, but I’m not sure if it’s effective in this context, so maybe C is the one to avoid.
CH
Chantell 1 year ago
I think we had a practice question about stakeholder mapping, and it really helps to understand who the key players are, so D might not be the answer.
SE
Serina 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like improving local amenities is a good way to gain support, so B seems like a safe option to pursue.
JE
Jettie 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how offering free shares could be seen as unethical or even bribery, so I think A might be the right answer.
TA
Tamesha 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this. I'll need to review the material on ransomware tactics to make sure I understand the right approaches.
AL
Altha 1 year ago
I'm not so sure about the details, but I remember we had questions about what goes into a project charter. The WBS might come later, though.
AN
Antione 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the specifics of ROADM node architecture. I'll have to review my notes to see if I can recall the number of degrees an omnidirectional add/drop unit can access.
CA
Carissa 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different code blocks. I'll need to carefully read through each one and understand the logic before deciding which one to use.
SO
Sommer 1 year ago
I hear they're also considering offering a year's supply of free donuts to the local residents. That's sure to win over the hearts and minds of the community!
LE
Lettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sommer
C) Develop and circulate a promotional video showing the benefits enjoyed by other countries in which LLL operates.
GL
Glenn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sommer
B) Commit to improving the local amenities and roads as a part of the application for a license in Country D.
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sommer
A) Issue free shares in a Joint Venture to develop oil fields to government ministers from Country D.
BE
Bernadine 2 years ago
Stakeholder mapping is crucial to understand the power dynamics and interests involved. Option D is a must-do, not something to avoid.
HA
Harris 2 years ago
Promotional videos are great, but they don't actually address the real concerns of the local stakeholders. Option C is not enough on its own.
MA
Marjory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
D) Undertake stakeholder mapping to identify the interests of the most powerful players in the decision to grant a license to LLL.
PH
Phung 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
C) Develop and circulate a promotional video showing the benefits enjoyed by other countries in which LLL operates.
FA
Fatima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
B) Commit to improving the local amenities and roads as a part of the application for a license in Country D.
ST
Staci 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
A) Issue free shares in a Joint Venture to develop oil fields to government ministers from Country D.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
I agree, a promotional video alone won't address the real concerns of the local stakeholders.
LA
Lavelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
C) Develop and circulate a promotional video showing the benefits enjoyed by other countries in which LLL operates.
CH
Cheryll 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
B) Commit to improving the local amenities and roads as a part of the application for a license in Country D.
AR
Argelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Harris
A) Issue free shares in a Joint Venture to develop oil fields to government ministers from Country D.
CH
Charlie 2 years ago
Option A is a clear conflict of interest and should not be considered. Bribing government officials is unethical and illegal.
AL
Aleisha 2 years ago
I think option B is the best approach. Committing to improving local amenities and infrastructure shows that LLL is taking the social impact seriously and trying to mitigate it.
JA
Jacqueline 2 years ago
I disagree. I think LLL should focus on improving local amenities and roads to show their commitment to the community.
MO
Mozell 2 years ago
I agree with you, Nickolas. That could be seen as bribery and unethical.
NI
Nickolas 2 years ago
I think LLL should not issue free shares to government ministers from Country D.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel