Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 8 Question 109 Discussion

Which of the following are cases where the veil should be lifted? Select ALL that apply.
D) The red company - Continues to trade despite being having small debts.
A) The pink company - Failed to disclose the full company name on official documents.
B) The orange company - Continues to trade even though it knows it is in irrevocable debt
C) The white company - An investigative journalist reveals that the company has been deliberately avoiding tax.
E) The black company - Trades with a company based in a country experiencing civil war.

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 8 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 8
[All CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions]

Which of the following are cases where the veil should be lifted? Select ALL that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Junita at Mar 20, 2025, 01:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Loren
9 months ago
E seems a bit extreme, but I guess it could be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
9 months ago
C is a clear case, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
9 months ago
I think B should be included too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
9 months ago
Wait, how does D even count? Small debts aren't a big deal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
9 months ago
A and C definitely apply here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
10 months ago
D seems a bit tricky; small debts might not be enough to justify lifting the veil, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify cases of misconduct. I feel like C is definitely a case for lifting the veil.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think B is a strong candidate since knowingly trading while in debt seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
10 months ago
I remember discussing how the veil can be lifted in cases of fraud or misrepresentation, so A and C might be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
10 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy - I'll go through each option and evaluate whether the circumstances justify lifting the corporate veil based on what I've learned in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of some of these options. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
11 months ago
The key here is to identify situations where the corporate veil should be lifted. I'll focus on the specific details provided for each company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about some of these cases. I'll need to think through the legal principles carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
11 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question, I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
1 year ago
I agree with the other candidates. Lifting the veil for those shady orange and black companies is a no-brainer. Although, I have to say, the pink company sounds more like a fashion label than a serious business.
upvoted 0 times
Oretha
1 year ago
I think we can all agree that the orange and black companies are the ones that need to be looked into.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
Yeah, those companies are definitely shady. The pink company does sound more like a fashion label though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
1 year ago
I agree, the orange and black companies definitely seem like they need the veil lifted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
1 year ago
Haha, the red company must be running on fumes if they're still trading with small debts. But hey, at least they're being honest about it, unlike those tax-dodging white company jokers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Small debts don't seem like enough to warrant piercing the veil. But the other options definitely seem valid to me.
upvoted 0 times
Sanjuana
1 year ago
Yeah, A, B, C, and E definitely raise some red flags that warrant lifting the veil.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I agree, D does seem less severe compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wendell
1 year ago
I'm not sure about D and E though. They seem like they could be risky, but not necessarily cases where the veil should be lifted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are B, C, and E. Lifting the corporate veil is justified when a company is insolvent, evading taxes, or engaging in risky international trade during conflict.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the pink and red companies though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 year ago
Yes, the black company trading in a country at war is a risky situation that justifies lifting the veil.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 year ago
I think the white company should also have the veil lifted for tax evasion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I agree, the orange company should definitely have the veil lifted for trading while in debt.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cordie
1 year ago
I agree with Brett. Those companies are clearly engaging in unethical practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 year ago
I think A, B, and C are cases where the veil should be lifted.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel