Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
CIMA Discussions
CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion
CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion
Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Questions]
Which of the following is not a relevant cost?
A
Sunk cost
B
Incremental cost
C
Avoidable cost
D
Differential cost
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
B
by
Loren
at
Apr 19, 2023, 08:57 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
0
/2000 characters
Submit
Cancel
Hollis
7 months ago
I thought all costs were relevant somehow?
upvoted
0
times
...
Adelina
7 months ago
Incremental costs matter, but sunk costs don’t.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jina
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that?
upvoted
0
times
...
Carline
7 months ago
Totally agree, sunk costs should be ignored.
upvoted
0
times
...
Coletta
8 months ago
Sunk cost is definitely not relevant!
upvoted
0
times
...
Tyisha
8 months ago
I definitely remember that incremental costs are relevant, so it must be sunk costs that don't matter here.
upvoted
0
times
...
Skye
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused about differential costs. I feel like they might be relevant, but I can't recall clearly.
upvoted
0
times
...
Alonso
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think avoidable costs are relevant, so that leaves sunk costs as the answer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Aracelis
8 months ago
I think sunk costs are the ones that aren't relevant, but I'm not entirely sure. We talked about them in class.
upvoted
0
times
...
Raina
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about disaster recovery plans. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted
0
times
...
Dorthy
8 months ago
I feel pretty confident saying that M.2 SATA drive support is definitely an upgrade for the M5 over M4. That was a highlight during our review sessions.
upvoted
0
times
...
Vallie
8 months ago
Easy peasy, I got this. Just need to do the subnet math.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ronnie
1 year ago
Differential cost? Isn't that what I pay the accountant to figure out?
upvoted
0
times
Emmanuel
12 months ago
Avoidable cost is also considered in decision-making.
upvoted
0
times
...
Hollis
12 months ago
Sunk cost is not a relevant cost in decision-making.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tiera
12 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The accountant helps determine the differential cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Carline
1 year ago
Avoidable cost? I'll believe it when I see it, like a unicorn.
upvoted
0
times
Latanya
11 months ago
Differential cost is a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Milly
11 months ago
Avoidable cost is not a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lina
12 months ago
Incremental cost is a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Katie
12 months ago
Sunk cost is not a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tonette
12 months ago
Differential cost is also a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Clarinda
1 year ago
Incremental cost is definitely a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
Sunk cost is not a relevant cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Laticia
1 year ago
Avoidable cost is a real thing, not a unicorn.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Sabrina
1 year ago
Incremental cost? That's just the price of my daily coffee habit.
upvoted
0
times
Portia
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it's the additional cost incurred by choosing one option over another.
upvoted
0
times
...
Nana
1 year ago
User 1: Incremental cost is actually a relevant cost in decision making.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Madonna
1 year ago
A sunk cost? Sounds like a trip to the beach to me!
upvoted
0
times
...
Daren
1 year ago
I think C) Avoidable cost is also not a relevant cost, because it can be avoided by taking a different course of action.
upvoted
0
times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
I agree with Tori, because sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred and cannot be changed.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tori
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Sunk cost.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Hollis
7 months agoAdelina
7 months agoJina
7 months agoCarline
7 months agoColetta
8 months agoTyisha
8 months agoSkye
8 months agoAlonso
8 months agoAracelis
8 months agoRaina
8 months agoDorthy
8 months agoVallie
8 months agoRonnie
1 year agoEmmanuel
12 months agoHollis
12 months agoTiera
12 months agoCarline
1 year agoLatanya
11 months agoMilly
11 months agoLina
12 months agoKatie
12 months agoTonette
12 months agoClarinda
1 year agoSheridan
1 year agoLaticia
1 year agoSabrina
1 year agoPortia
1 year agoNana
1 year agoMadonna
1 year agoDaren
1 year agoBeckie
1 year agoTori
1 year ago