MENU
Which of the following is not a relevant cost?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
HO
Hollis
12 months ago
I thought all costs were relevant somehow?
AD
Adelina
12 months ago
Incremental costs matter, but sunk costs don’t.
JI
Jina
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure about that?
CA
Carline
1 year ago
Totally agree, sunk costs should be ignored.
CO
Coletta
1 year ago
Sunk cost is definitely not relevant!
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
I definitely remember that incremental costs are relevant, so it must be sunk costs that don't matter here.
SK
Skye
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about differential costs. I feel like they might be relevant, but I can't recall clearly.
AL
Alonso
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think avoidable costs are relevant, so that leaves sunk costs as the answer.
AR
Aracelis
1 year ago
I think sunk costs are the ones that aren't relevant, but I'm not entirely sure. We talked about them in class.
RA
Raina
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about disaster recovery plans. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
DO
Dorthy
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident saying that M.2 SATA drive support is definitely an upgrade for the M5 over M4. That was a highlight during our review sessions.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
Easy peasy, I got this. Just need to do the subnet math.
RO
Ronnie
1 year ago
Differential cost? Isn't that what I pay the accountant to figure out?
EM
Emmanuel
1 year ago
Avoidable cost is also considered in decision-making.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
Sunk cost is not a relevant cost in decision-making.
TI
Tiera
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. The accountant helps determine the differential cost.
CA
Carline
2 years ago
Avoidable cost? I'll believe it when I see it, like a unicorn.
LA
Latanya
1 year ago
Differential cost is a relevant cost.
MI
Milly
1 year ago
Avoidable cost is not a relevant cost.
LI
Lina
1 year ago
Incremental cost is a relevant cost.
KA
Katie
1 year ago
Sunk cost is not a relevant cost.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
Differential cost is also a relevant cost.
CL
Clarinda
1 year ago
Incremental cost is definitely a relevant cost.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
Sunk cost is not a relevant cost.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
Avoidable cost is a real thing, not a unicorn.
SA
Sabrina
2 years ago
Incremental cost? That's just the price of my daily coffee habit.
PO
Portia
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it's the additional cost incurred by choosing one option over another.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
User 1: Incremental cost is actually a relevant cost in decision making.
MA
Madonna
2 years ago
A sunk cost? Sounds like a trip to the beach to me!
DA
Daren
2 years ago
I think C) Avoidable cost is also not a relevant cost, because it can be avoided by taking a different course of action.
BE
Beckie
2 years ago
I agree with Tori, because sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred and cannot be changed.
TO
Tori
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Sunk cost.