Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 69 Discussion

rson's correlation coefficient between the number of shirts sold per day (x) and the number of jackets sold per day (y), across its eight stores (n=8).What is the Pearson's correlation coefficient? Give your answer to two decimal places.
C) 0.85
A) 0.83
B) 0.84
D) 0.86

CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Questions]

rson's correlation coefficient between the number of shirts sold per day (x) and the number of jackets sold per day (y), across its eight stores (n=8).

What is the Pearson's correlation coefficient? Give your answer to two decimal places.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Hubert at Apr 19, 2023, 03:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Winifred
8 months ago
Definitely not 0.83, that feels too low for this trend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
9 months ago
Wow, I didn’t expect such a strong correlation!
upvoted 0 times
...
An
9 months ago
0.86 seems a bit high, doesn’t it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
9 months ago
I disagree, I feel like it’s closer to 0.85.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
9 months ago
I think it’s around 0.84 based on the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
9 months ago
I definitely need to double-check my calculations, but I think 0.85 sounds familiar from my practice sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
9 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the values; I thought the correlation was supposed to be higher, maybe around 0.86?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
I think I saw a similar question in our last mock exam, and I want to say the answer was around 0.84.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
9 months ago
I remember practicing correlation coefficients, but I'm not sure if I calculated it correctly for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by the question. Is HAVING really an option here? That doesn't seem like the right tool for the job. I'll have to think this through carefully and review my SQL knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this! The key is to focus on the relationship between the queen and the people surrounding her. I think the answer is C - "carefully".
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
10 months ago
I remember chaining procedures focus on sequences of behavior. This feels more like a structured plan, so maybe it's the intervention plan?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
10 months ago
Looks like a good opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge of Kubernetes security best practices. I'll make sure to thoroughly address each violation and provide the appropriate fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
I think the key here is that Pacific Suites, as the parent company, should have ensured its existing data access and storage procedures were integrated into PHT's system. That seems like the most comprehensive approach to protecting the sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
1 year ago
Maybe they should start selling shirts and jackets as a package deal. That would really boost the correlation!
upvoted 0 times
Merilyn
1 year ago
Definitely worth considering for increasing overall sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
I agree, it's a smart strategy to boost correlation between the two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
1 year ago
I think so too. People love deals and bundles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
That's a good idea! It could definitely increase sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Val
1 year ago
I bet the store manager is regretting not selling socks too. Then we'd have a triple correlation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
Easy peasy, the answer is D) 0.86. Just look at that graph - the points are practically lined up! I could calculate this in my head.
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
1 year ago
The graph makes it so clear that the correlation coefficient is 0.86. It's a strong relationship between the two variables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
1 year ago
It's amazing how strong the correlation is between shirts and jackets sales. 0.86 is a high coefficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 year ago
I agree, the correlation coefficient is 0.86. The points are very close to forming a perfect line.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
1 year ago
I'm torn between C) 0.85 and D) 0.86. The data seems to have a strong positive correlation, but I'll go with the lower value just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Francene
1 year ago
I would go with C) 0.85 as well. It's better to err on the side of caution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 year ago
I agree, it's always better to be cautious with these types of calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
I think C) 0.85 is a safe choice. It's better to go with the lower value.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
1 year ago
Hmm, the graph looks a bit scattered, but I'm going with C) 0.85. That seems like a reasonable correlation coefficient given the overall trend.
upvoted 0 times
Ligia
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards D) 0.86. The points are not perfectly aligned, but there is a clear positive relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
1 year ago
I'm going with B) 0.84. The points are somewhat scattered, but there seems to be a positive trend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
1 year ago
I agree with you, I also think it's A) 0.83. The correlation looks strong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I think it's A) 0.83. The points seem to be clustered around a line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 year ago
I think it's A) 0.83. The points are a bit spread out, but there seems to be a positive relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
1 year ago
I'm going with D) 0.86. The points seem to have a clear positive trend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 year ago
I agree with you, I also think it's B) 0.84. The correlation looks pretty strong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
1 year ago
I think it's B) 0.84. The points seem to be clustered around a line.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
1 year ago
I got 0.85 as the Pearson's correlation coefficient, so I would choose option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 year ago
I agree with Jesusa, I also calculated it to be 0.84.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
I think the Pearson's correlation coefficient is 0.84.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) 0.84. The scatterplot shows a positive linear relationship between the number of shirts and jackets sold, and the data points seem to cluster around a straight line.
upvoted 0 times
Dustin
1 year ago
Yes, it looks like option B) 0.84 is the correct answer based on the scatterplot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
1 year ago
That makes sense, the data points do seem to follow a straight line pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 year ago
I think the correlation coefficient is 0.84, which matches option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 year ago
I agree, the scatterplot does show a positive linear relationship between shirts and jackets sold.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel