New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CheckPoint 156-835 Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-835 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All 156-835 Questions]

There's a 23800 appliance with quad NIC in slot 5. What would be the name of port 3 on this NIC?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tom
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards ethsBP5-03, seems like a logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
4 months ago
Definitely not ethBP-05, that doesn't even have the right numbering!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
4 months ago
Wait, is it really that straightforward? I thought it could be more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
4 months ago
I think it's actually ethBP3-05, not sure why anyone would pick anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
4 months ago
Port 3 on a quad NIC in slot 5 should be ethBP3-05.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
I thought it was always the slot number first, so I’m leaning towards ethBP3-05, but I could be mixing it up with another question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the "eths" prefix is important, but I can't remember if it's 3 or 5 for the slot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the second part being the port number, so could it be ethsBP5-03?
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
5 months ago
I think the port naming convention usually includes the slot number first, so maybe it's something like ethBP3-05?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
This one looks straightforward - I think the answer is platform admins and platform users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
Delaying action sounds risky, but I wonder if it could protect the investigation's integrity. Did we cover the pros and cons of all these options in class?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
5 months ago
Wait, is a sandbox really just for executing malicious code? That doesn't sound right to me. I think it's more about safely testing and experimenting with code, not running anything harmful. I'll have to double-check my understanding on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel