Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CheckPoint 156-835 Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

There are two 10Gbps dual-port NICs and one 40Gbps NIC installed on a 23800 Appliance in slots 1, 2 and 3 accordingly. Which interfaces should be connected to Orchestrator 1 for downlinks' intra-orchestrator redundancy when using two Orchestrators?
C) Port 1 in Slot 1 and Port 2 in Slot 1
A) Any pair of available ports
B) Port 1 in Slot 2 and Port 2 in Slot 1
D) This configuration is not supported

CheckPoint 156-835 Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-835 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All 156-835 Questions]

There are two 10Gbps dual-port NICs and one 40Gbps NIC installed on a 23800 Appliance in slots 1, 2 and 3 accordingly. Which interfaces should be connected to Orchestrator 1 for downlinks' intra-orchestrator redundancy when using two Orchestrators?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Fabiola
6 months ago
C is a no-go, you can't use both ports in the same slot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
6 months ago
Wait, is this really supported? Sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
7 months ago
I’d go with B, seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
7 months ago
Definitely not D, that’s just wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
7 months ago
I think any pair of available ports should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
7 months ago
I feel like option D might be a trick answer, but I can't remember if this specific setup is actually supported or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
7 months ago
If I recall correctly, connecting both ports from different NICs is usually the best practice for redundancy, but I'm not sure about the specific slots here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
8 months ago
I think I came across a similar question in practice exams, and I believe it was about using different slots for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
8 months ago
I remember studying about NIC configurations, but I'm not entirely sure which ports provide the best redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
8 months ago
This is a good networking question. I'll draw out a diagram in my head to visualize the different NIC options and how they should be connected for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
8 months ago
I'm not totally confident about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, and I'm not sure I fully understand the requirements. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to use the high-speed 40Gbps NIC for the redundant connection between the Orchestrators. I'll select that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of connecting the NICs to the Orchestrators. Let me re-read the question and see if I can figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward networking question. I'll carefully read through the details and think about the redundancy requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
1 year ago
I bet the person who wrote this question is a real comedian. 'This configuration is not supported' - classic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 year ago
C. is just silly. Who would connect both ports to the same slot? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Viola
11 months ago
C) is just silly. Who would connect both ports to the same slot? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
12 months ago
B) Port 1 in Slot 2 and Port 2 in Slot 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
1 year ago
A) Any pair of available ports
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emogene
1 year ago
A. looks tempting, but it doesn't address the need for redundancy. Gotta think about fault tolerance, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 year ago
D. seems more likely, as the mix of 10Gbps and 40Gbps interfaces might not be supported by the Orchestrator. Gotta read the fine print!
upvoted 0 times
Denny
12 months ago
I agree, better safe than sorry when it comes to network configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
12 months ago
I agree, better safe than sorry when it comes to network configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
12 months ago
Yeah, it's always important to check the compatibility before making any connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
1 year ago
Yeah, it's always important to check the compatibility before setting up the connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 year ago
I think D is the correct answer, mixing different speeds might not be supported by the Orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
I think D is the correct answer, mixing different speeds might not be supported by the Orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. It makes sense to use the ports from different slots to ensure redundancy between the Orchestrators.
upvoted 0 times
Barney
1 year ago
Yes, it's important to have a backup in case one of the ports or slots fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
1 year ago
I agree, using ports from different slots is a good idea for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the configuration might not be supported, so the answer could be D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Port 1 in Slot 1 and Port 2 in Slot 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Port 1 in Slot 2 and Port 2 in Slot 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel