Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CheckPoint Exam 156-315.81 Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-315.81 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All 156-315.81 Questions]

Due to high CPU workload on the Security Gateway, the security administrator decided to purchase a new multicore CPU to replace the existing single core CPU. After installation, is the administrator required to perform any additional tasks?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-PTG/CoreXL-Configuring-IPv4-and-IPv6-CoreXL-FW-instances.htm?Highlight=Configuring%20the%20Number%20of%20IPv4%20CoreXL%20Firewall%20Instances R81 https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/Topics-PTG/CoreXL-Configuring-IPv4-and-IPv6-CoreXL-FW-instances.htm cpconfig -> Enter the number of the Check Point CoreXL option. ( Enter 1 to select Change the number of firewall instances. OR Enter 2 for the option Change the number of IPv6 firewall instances.) -> Enter the total number of IPv4 (IPv6) CoreXL Firewall instances you wish the Security Gateway to run. Follow the instructions on the screen. -> Exit from the cpconfig menu. - Reboot the Security Gateway.


by Elza at Aug 24, 2022, 05:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-315.81 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Aleta
3 days ago
This seems like a straightforward question about when to use the interviewing method for requirements gathering. I'll need to think through the different scenarios presented and choose the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 days ago
I think statement A might be the one that's incorrect, but I'm not entirely sure. It feels like there's something off about the marital deduction in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel