Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CheckPoint 156-315.81 Exam - Topic 13 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-315.81 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 13
[All 156-315.81 Questions]

The Compliance Blade allows you to search for text strings in many windows and panes, to search for a value in a field, what would your syntax be?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Daniela at Jun 26, 2022, 09:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-315.81 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Zena
5 months ago
Totally agree with A, it's the most logical choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
6 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple? I thought it was more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
6 months ago
C looks right to me, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
6 months ago
B seems off, it doesn't follow the usual syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
6 months ago
I think it's definitely A. That's how I've always done it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards field name:string, but I can't recall if spaces are valid in the syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
6 months ago
I feel like it might be name field:string, but that seems a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
6 months ago
I think the syntax should be field_name:string, but I'm not entirely sure if underscores are allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
6 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think it was name_field:string that worked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
7 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Spark coding question. I think I can handle this - the key is to parse the log file, filter for female users, and then calculate the total online time for each user and print out the ones over 2 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I thought non-repudiation was more of a security feature, so maybe it's not in the application layer. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
7 months ago
Hmm, not sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing. I'll need to re-read it a few times and make sure I understand all the relevant tax rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
7 months ago
I think the service preference plays a key role in determining bandwidth, but I keep mixing it up with conference templates.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel