Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 3
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

The New York-based Irwin Goldreich Schmidt (IGS) is a mid-sized private equity firm with $300 million capital raised from its investors. Amid a turbulent year, the firm has recently dropped its unsuccessful $100 million bid for a Norwegian media company and is now aggressively searching for new venture or buyout investments in the Eurozone. After several months of intense search IGS believes it identified two potential investments:

1. Sverig, a rapidly expanding Swedish start-up construction company.

2. L'Offre, a struggling French department store in existence since the late 19th Century.

Following several rounds of successful negotiations, IGS makes a $20 million investment in Sverig and a $100 million leveraged buyout investment in L'Offre, committing to an additional $100 million for possible future capital drawdowns. It retains all of Sverig's managers but replaces L'Offre's management team with experienced IGS managers, many of whom are former company senior executives.

IGS also sets up Sverig-L'Offre Private Equity Fund (SLPEF), a fund to manage both firms. The fund manager's compensation is set at 20% of profits net of fees. IGS also specifies that the manager's profits are calculated on the entire portfolio when portfolio value exceeds invested capital by 30%.

Despite the market's recent turbulence, Sverig's original founders are extremely optimistic and believe the firm could be sold for $400 million in six years. To achieve this, they speculate the firm needs another capital infusion of $40 million in four years in addition to the $20 million capital investment today. Given the high risk of the firm, SLPEFs private equity investors decide that a discount rate of 40% for the first four years and 30% for the last two years is appropriate. The founders of Sverig want to hold 5 million shares.

An appropriate equity valuation technique for Sveng and L'Offre, respectively, would be the:

Sverig L'Offre

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Bobbye
4 months ago
Wait, they think Sverig can be worth $400 million in six years? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
4 months ago
Totally agree, Sverig has huge potential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
4 months ago
Not sure about L'Offre, seems like a risky buy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
Dropping that $100 million bid was a smart move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
5 months ago
IGS has $300 million capital raised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
5 months ago
For Sverig, I definitely think the venture capital method is right, but I’m not confident about the best approach for L'Offre.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
5 months ago
I feel like the relative value approach might be more appropriate for L'Offre, but I can't recall the exact reasons we went over in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
5 months ago
I think the DCF method could work for L'Offre since it's an established company, but I’m a bit confused about how to apply it given its struggles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
6 months ago
I remember we discussed the venture capital method being suitable for start-ups like Sverig, but I'm not entirely sure about L'Offre.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. For Sverig, it seems like the venture capital method would be appropriate given the high-growth, high-risk nature of the startup. And for L'Offre, the DCF method seems like the way to go since it's an established but struggling business. I think I've got a handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the details of the SLPEF fund structure and the compensation model for the fund manager. I'll need to re-read that part carefully to make sure I understand it before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
6 months ago
This question looks pretty straightforward. I think I can handle it - the key is to identify the appropriate valuation techniques for each investment based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
6 months ago
This is a lot of information to take in. I'm not sure I fully understand all the nuances of the different valuation techniques and how to apply them in this specific context. I may need to spend some extra time reviewing my notes before tackling this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. Those values look like an IP address, a hostname, and a MAC address. I'm guessing the question is asking which type of entity in Elasticsearch those would be matched against. I'll have to weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
6 months ago
Hmm, not sure about this one. I'll have to think back to my materials science lectures to remember what SSC stands for and the temperature ranges associated with that. Gonna have to do some quick mental reviewing here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
11 months ago
I wonder if the IGS managers will be wearing powdered wigs and riding horse-drawn carriages to the office, since they're taking over that 19th-century department store. But in all seriousness, the valuation choices make sense.
upvoted 0 times
Wendell
9 months ago
That makes sense, the Venture capital method focuses on the potential for growth and turnaround of a company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
9 months ago
For L'Offre, the Venture capital method might be more suitable considering it's a struggling department store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
10 months ago
I agree, the DCF method takes into account future cash flows which is crucial for a start-up like Sverig.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
10 months ago
Definitely, the Venture capital method makes sense for valuing a struggling department store like L'Offre.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
11 months ago
Agreed, the DCF method is more suitable for valuing a rapidly expanding start-up like Sverig.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I think the DCF method would be appropriate for Sverig and the Venture capital method for L'Offre.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
11 months ago
I think the DCF method would be appropriate for valuing Sverig.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Owen
11 months ago
I'm just curious, does the 40% discount rate mean Sverig's founders will be paying themselves in Bitcoin? Jokes aside, the answers seem pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
11 months ago
Hmm, I'd say the relative value approach could work for L'Offre too. After all, if it's been around since the 19th century, there must be some comparable companies out there, right? As for Sverig, the venture capital method is a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
Ellsworth
11 months ago
Definitely, the venture capital method is a good choice for Sverig. It's a start-up with high growth potential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
11 months ago
I agree, using the relative value approach for L'Offre makes sense. It's important to consider comparable companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Crissy
11 months ago
I agree with Buck, the Venture capital method seems more fitting for Sverig's valuation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
11 months ago
Agreed! The venture capital method is perfect for Sverig, and the DCF method is the way to go for L'Offre. Now, can someone explain to me how to calculate a 40% discount rate? My calculator just laughed at me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the DCF method would be more suitable for valuing L'Offre.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
11 months ago
The venture capital method seems like the way to go for Sverig, given the high-risk startup nature of the business. As for L'Offre, the DCF method would be more appropriate to capture the struggling department store's future cash flows.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
10 months ago
That makes sense, considering the struggling department store's situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
10 months ago
For L'Offre, the DCF method would be more fitting to assess its future cash flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
11 months ago
I agree, it's a high-risk startup that could benefit from that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
11 months ago
I think the venture capital method is suitable for Sverig.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
12 months ago
I think the appropriate equity valuation technique for Sverig would be the Venture capital method.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel