Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 3
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Factor Analytics Capital Management makes portfolio recommendations using various factor models. Mauricio Rodriguez, a Factor Analytics research analyst, is examining the prospects of two portfolios, the FACM Century Fund (CF) and the FACM Esquire Fund (EF).

The variance of returns are identical for the two funds. The estimates in Exhibit 1 were derived for CF and EF using monthly data for the past five years.

Supervisor Barbara Woodson asks Rodriguez to use the Capita! Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and a multifactor model (APT) to make a decision to continue or discontinue the EF fund. The two factors in the multifactor model are not identified. To help with the decision, Woodson provides Rodriguez with the capital market forecasts in Exhibit 2.

After examining the prospects for the EF portfolio, Rodriguez derives the forecasts in Exhibit 3.

Rodriguez also develops a 2-factor macroeconomic factor model for the EF portfolio. The two factors used in the model are the surprise in GDP growth and the surprise in Investor Sentiment. The equation for the macro factor model is:

During an investment committee meeting, Woodson makes the following statements related to the 2-factor macroeconomic factor model.

Statement 1: An investment combination in CF and EF that provides a GDP growth factor beta equal to one and an Investor Sentiment factor beta equal to zero will have lower active factor risk than a tracking portfolio consisting of CF and EF.

Statement 2: When markets are in equilibrium, no combination of CF and EF will produce an arbitrage opportunity

In their final meeting, Rodriguez informs Woodson that the CF portfolio consistently outperformed its benchmark over the past five years. Rodriguez makes the following comments to Woodson: "The consistency with which CF outperformed its benchmark is amazing. The difference between the CF monthly return and its benchmark return was nearly always positive and varied little over time."

Using the market model estimates for CF and EF, which fund has higher:

Systematic risk? Unsystematic risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Amira
5 months ago
I think EF might surprise us if those factors play out differently!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
5 months ago
Statement 2 makes sense, no arbitrage in equilibrium.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
5 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure about the unsystematic risk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
6 months ago
Totally agree, CF seems like the safer bet!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
6 months ago
CF has consistently outperformed its benchmark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
I feel like I need to double-check the definitions, but I think CF's consistent outperformance suggests it might have lower unsystematic risk compared to EF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
6 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice one where we had to compare two funds based on their betas. I think CF has the higher systematic risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think unsystematic risk is more about individual fund performance, so maybe EF has higher unsystematic risk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
6 months ago
I remember studying that systematic risk is related to market movements, so I think CF might have higher systematic risk since it outperformed consistently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the details here. The question seems to be testing our understanding of different types of misrepresentation, but I'm not entirely sure which one applies best in this scenario. I'll need to carefully re-read the passage and think through the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
6 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the requirements - the sales director wants users to be able to check for existing Accounts, but not view each other's Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
6 months ago
Ah, I've seen this kind of thing before. My money's on an XSS vulnerability in an input element. That could definitely cause some serious trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
11 months ago
I love how Woodson is throwing around terms like 'arbitrage opportunity' and 'active factor risk' - makes me feel like I'm in a finance version of the Da Vinci Code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
Wait, so the CF fund consistently outperformed its benchmark, but we're still considering discontinuing the EF fund? Sounds like someone needs to check their math and make sure they're not missing something here.
upvoted 0 times
Kerrie
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
10 months ago
Woodson: Statement 1 suggests a combination of CF and EF with specific factor betas can reduce active factor risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
10 months ago
Rodriguez: The CF fund has been performing well, but we need to analyze the systematic and unsystematic risk for both CF and EF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
10 months ago
Woodson: Rodriguez, we need to make a decision on the EF fund. Let's use the CAPM and APT models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
10 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dacia
11 months ago
Interesting that the two funds have identical variances of returns, yet different systematic and unsystematic risks. The CAPM and APT models should help provide more clarity on the underlying factors driving the performance of these funds.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
10 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
10 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
11 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raul
12 months ago
But what about unsystematic risk? Could EF have higher unsystematic risk due to its underperformance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
12 months ago
The CF portfolio has higher systematic risk, as evidenced by the higher beta value compared to the EF portfolio. However, the unsystematic risk seems to be higher for the EF portfolio, based on the larger variance of returns.
upvoted 0 times
Isidra
11 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
11 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audrie
12 months ago
I agree with you, Lera. CF's consistent outperformance indicates higher systematic risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
1 year ago
I think CF has higher systematic risk because it consistently outperformed its benchmark.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel