Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 3
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Rock Torrey, an analyst for International Retailers Incorporated (IRI), has been asked to evaluate the firm's swap transactions in general, as well as a 2-year fixed for fixed currency swap involving the U .S . dollar and the Mexican peso in particular. The dollar is Torrey's domestic currency, and the exchange rate as of June 1,2009, was $0.0893 per peso. The swap calls for annual payments and exchange of notional principal at the beginning and end of the swap term and has a notional principal of $100 million. The counterparty to the swap is GHS Bank, a large full-service bank in Mexico.

The current term structure of interest rates for both countries is given in the following table:

Torrey believes the swap will help his firm effectively mitigate its foreign currency exposure in Mexico, which sterns mainly from shopping centers in high-end resorts located along the eastern coastline. Having made this conclusion, Torrey begins writing his report for the management of IRI. In addition to the terms of the swap, Torrey includes the following information in the report:

* Implicit in the currency swap under consideration is a swap spread of 75 basis points over 2-year U .S . Treasury securities. This represents a 10 basis point narrowing of the spread as compared to this time last year. Thus, we can assume that the credit risk of the global credit market has decreased. Unfortunately, the decline provides no insight into the credit risk of the individual currency swap with GHS Bank, which could have increased.

* In order to decrease the counterparty default risk on the currency swap, we will need to utilize credit derivatives between the beginning and midpoint of the swap's life when this particular risk is at its highest. This is a significantly different strategy than we normally use with interest rate swaps. For interest rate swaps, counterparty default risk peaks at the middle of the swap's life, at which point we utilize credit derivative CQuntermeasures to offset the risk.

* Because currency swaps almost always include netting agreements and interest rate swaps can be structured to include mark-to-market agreements, we can significantly reduce the credit risk of these swap instruments by negotiating swap contracts that include these respective features. When negotiating these features is not possible, credit risk can be reduced by using off-market swaps that do not require an initial payment from IRI.

Six months have passed (180 days) since Torrey issued his report to IRI's management team, and the current exchange rate is now $0,085 per peso. The new term structure of interest rates is as follows:

Evaluate Torrey's statements regarding IRPs ability to mitigate the credit risk inherent in currency swaps and interest rate swaps. Torrey is only correct regarding:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Torrey is only correct regarding mark-to-market agreements. Using mark-to-marker agreements for interest rate swaps will reduce credit risk by periodically computing the value of the swap and then requiring payment of that amount by one of the counterparties. At some predetermined time, the swap is revalued according to the new term structure of interest rates, and one party pays the other party any amount due. The swap is then repriced, essentially creating a new swap with no credit risk. Netting payments is also an effective way to reduce credit risk in interest rate and equity swaps. However, currency swap payments are generally not netted. Torrey has incorrectly stated that netting is almost always used in currency swaps. Using off-market swaps is not generally a method to reduce credit risk. If IRI enters into an off-market swap in which they do not owe a payment, then a payment is owed to IRI by the counterparty. This would actually increase credit risk since the counterparty could potentially default on the initial payment. (Study Session 17,'LOS 61A)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sheron
5 months ago
The swap spread narrowing is a good sign for the market overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
Wow, didn't realize the credit risk could vary so much between swap types!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Off-market swaps? Not sure they really help that much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
6 months ago
Disagree, mark-to-market agreements are just as important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
6 months ago
I think netting agreements are definitely a good way to reduce credit risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
6 months ago
I feel like I need to double-check the specifics on how credit derivatives work in currency swaps. It seems different from interest rate swaps, but I can't recall the details clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question on credit risk in swaps, and I think off-market swaps can definitely help mitigate some risks, but I'm not sure if that's what Torrey meant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the mark-to-market agreements. I thought they were more relevant for interest rate swaps, but maybe they apply here too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
6 months ago
I remember studying how netting agreements can help reduce credit risk in swaps, so I think Torrey might be right about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Option A with packet mirroring is the way to go. It allows me to inspect the actual traffic, which is the most comprehensive approach. I just need to make sure I set up the security software correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
6 months ago
Creating a footer to display the page number seems like the most logical solution. That way, I can easily keep track of the page numbers as I type the book.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
6 months ago
Ah, I remember this from the lectures. Link aggregation is specifically designed to work at Layer 2, so the correct answer is True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
6 months ago
This question is a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure which report type would be the best fit, but I'm leaning towards the Queue Metrics reports since they seem to focus specifically on queue-related metrics. I'll double-check the descriptions, but that's my initial thought.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel