Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute CFA-Level-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 3
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Delicious Candy Company (Delicious) is a leading manufacturer and distributor of quality confectionery products throughout Europe and Mexico. Delicious is a publicly-traded firm located in Italy and has been in business over 60 years.

Caleb Scott, an equity analyst with a large pension fund, has been asked to complete a comprehensive analysis of Delicious in order to evaluate the possibility of a future investment.

Scott compiles the selected financial data found in Exhibit 1 and learns that Delicious owns a 30% equity interest in a supplier located in the United States. Delicious uses the equity method to account for its investment in the U .S . associate.

Scott reads the Delicious's revenue recognition footnote found in Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 2: Revenue Recognition Footnote

__________________________________________________________________________________

in millions__________________________________________________________________________

Revenue is recognized, net of returns and allowances, when the goods are shipped to customers and collectability is assured. Several customers remit payment before delivery in order to receive additional discounts. Delicious reports these amounts as unearned revenue until the goods are shipped. Unearned revenue was 7,201 at the end of 2009 and 5,514 at the end of 2008.

Delicious operates two geographic segments: Europe and Mexico. Selected financial information for each segment is found in Exhibit 3.

At the beginning of 2009, Delicious entered into an operating lease for manufacturing equipment. At inception, the present value of the lease payments, discounted at an interest rate of 10%, was 6300 million. The lease term is six years and the annual payment is 669 million. Similar equipment owned by Delicious is depreciated using the straight-line method and no residual values are assumed.

Scott gathers the information in Exhibit 4 to determine the implied "stand-alone" value of Delicious without regard to the value of its U .S . associate.

Using the data found in Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 4, Delicious's implied P/E multiple without regard to its U .S . associate is closest to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Delicious's implied value without its U .S . associate is 90,736 [97,525 Delicious market cap - 6,739 pro-rata share of associates market cap ($32,330 x 30% x 0.70 current exchange rate)].

Delicious's net income without associate is 6,147 (6,501 net income - 354 pro-rata share of income from associate).

Implied P/E = 14.8 (90,736 Delicious implied value without associate / 6,147 Delicious net income without associate). (Study Session 7, LOS 26.e)


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jaclyn
4 months ago
I disagree, I feel like it could be closer to 15.1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
4 months ago
Wait, they have a 30% stake in a U.S. supplier? That's interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
I think the P/E multiple is definitely around 14.8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
4 months ago
Their unearned revenue dropped a lot from 2008 to 2009. What's up with that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
4 months ago
Delicious has been around for over 60 years!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how to handle the unearned revenue in the P/E calculation. Did we cover that in our review sessions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
This question reminds me of a similar one we did about revenue recognition and its effect on financial ratios. I hope I can apply that knowledge here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
I think the implied P/E multiple should exclude the U.S. associate's impact, but I can't recall the exact steps to isolate that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
5 months ago
I remember we practiced calculating P/E multiples, but I'm unsure how to adjust for the equity method here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
6 months ago
Alright, time to put on my analyst hat. This is a straightforward valuation exercise, I just need to focus on the relevant data and crunch the numbers. I'm feeling pretty confident I can nail this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
6 months ago
I think I've got a handle on this. The key is using the data in Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 4 to calculate the implied P/E multiple. I just need to make sure I'm doing the math correctly. Slow and steady should get me to the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a lot of information to take in. I'm a bit overwhelmed trying to figure out where to start. Maybe I should re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand what I'm being asked to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I need to calculate Delicious's implied P/E multiple without regard to its U.S. associate. The data in Exhibit 4 looks relevant for that, so I'll start by reviewing that carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
9 months ago
Alright, let's dive into this financial data. Looks like we've got some nice geographical diversification with the Europe and Mexico segments. Gotta love that global reach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
9 months ago
Whoa, 60 years in business? That's some serious longevity in the candy game. I wonder if they've ever had a Willy Wonka-esque golden ticket scandal. That would really shake up the European confectionery market!
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
8 months ago
Yeah, 60 years is a long time to build up trust with customers. I don't think they would jeopardize that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
9 months ago
I highly doubt they would risk their reputation like that after being in business for so long.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 months ago
That would be quite the scandal! I bet it would make for an interesting movie plot.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracie
9 months ago
I also calculated it to be 14.8, so I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
10 months ago
I agree with Mitzie, the implied P/E multiple without regard to its U.S. associate is closest to 14.8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
10 months ago
I think the answer is B) 14.8.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
The revenue recognition policy seems a bit unclear to me. Shouldn't unearned revenue be recognized as revenue when the goods are shipped, not before? This could impact the P/E calculation.
upvoted 0 times
Lachelle
8 months ago
We should consider how this policy affects the overall valuation of Delicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
8 months ago
The timing of recognizing revenue can definitely impact the P/E calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
8 months ago
It's important to understand how unearned revenue is treated in financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 months ago
I agree, the revenue recognition policy does seem a bit confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel